|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1573-1580
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology |
a Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Ill
b Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
c Heart Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
d Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
e University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa
f OSF St Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Ill
g University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
h Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane, Wash
i Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif
j University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif.
Received for publication August 31, 2006; revisions received December 6, 2006; accepted for publication December 12, 2006. * Address for reprints: Mark Slaughter, MD, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 W 95th St, Suite 205, Oak Lawn, Il 60453. (Email: mscabg{at}aol.com).
Objective: The Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif) can be used for univentricular or biventricular support in patients with a body surface area as low as 1.3 m2. Results of the multicenter clinical trial are reviewed.
Methods: Between October 2001 and June 2004, a total of 39 patients at 12 institutions were supported with the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device. Twenty-four patients (62%) received left ventricular assist devices and 15 (38%) received biventricular assist devices. Indications included bridge to transplantation (n = 30) and postcardiotomy failure (n = 9). The control group included 100 patients from the Food and Drug Administration approval submissions for the paracorporeal version of the ventricular assist device.
Results: Twenty-eight male and 11 female patients, with mean age of 48 years (1671 years) and body surface area of 1.9 m2 (1.32.4 m2) were supported for 3938 patient-days (10.8 patient-years). Mean left ventricular assist device flow index on the first postoperative day was 2.5 ± 0.5 L/(min · m2). Mean duration of support was 101 days (9597 days). Eighteen patients were discharged after a mean duration of 96 days. There were no ventricular assist device failures. Complications included 13 cases of bleeding requiring reexploration (33.3%), 1 embolic and 2 hemorrhagic strokes (7.7%), 5 driveline infections (12.8%), and 2 pocket infections (5%). Support to successful outcomes was 70% for bridge to transplantation and 67% for postcardiotomy recovery, versus historical results for the paracorporeal ventricular assist device of 69% for bridge to transplantation and 48% for postcardiotomy recovery.
Conclusion: The Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device is a new implantable pulsatile ventricular assist device that allows hospital discharge for patients as a bridge to transplantation or for postcardiotomy failure. It is the first Food and Drug Administrationapproved implantable ventricular assist device with biventricular capability.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. A. Felix, J. R. Martina, J. H. Kirkels, C. Klopping, H. Nathoe, E. Sukkel, N. Hulstein, F. Z. Ramjankhan, P. A. F. M. Doevendans, J. R. Lahpor, et al. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support in patients with advanced heart failure: points of interest for the daily management Eur J Heart Fail, February 3, 2012; (2012) hfs012v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Pitsis, A. N. Visouli, V. Ninios, and D. T. Kremastinos Total ventricular assist for long-term treatment of heart failure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2011; 142(2): 464 - 467. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Krabatsch, M. Schweiger, M. Dandel, A. Stepanenko, T. Drews, E. Potapov, M. Pasic, Y.-G. Weng, M. Huebler, and R. Hetzer Is Bridge to Recovery More Likely With Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Devices Than With Nonpulsatile-Flow Systems? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2011; 91(5): 1335 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. John, J. W. Long, H. T. Massey, B. P. Griffith, B. C. Sun, A. J. Tector, O. H. Frazier, and L. D. Joyce Outcomes of a multicenter trial of the Levitronix CentriMag ventricular assist system for short-term circulatory support J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2011; 141(4): 932 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Hamour, A. Khaghani, P. K. Kanagala, A. G. Mitchell, and N. R. Banner Current outcome of heart transplantation: a 10-year single centre perspective and review QJM, April 1, 2011; 104(4): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sheinberg, M. B. Brady, and N. Mitter Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography and Ventricular Assist Device Insertion Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2011; 15(1-2): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Thompson, K. J. Philip, S. Simsir, and E. R. Schwarz Review: The New Concept of ''Interventional Heart Failure Therapy'': Part 2--Inotropes, Valvular Disease, Pumps, and Transplantation Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2010; 15(3): 231 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Rogers, K. D. Aaronson, A. J. Boyle, S. D. Russell, C. A. Milano, F. D. Pagani, B. S. Edwards, S. Park, R. John, J. V. Conte, et al. Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Improves Functional Capacity and Quality of Life of Advanced Heart Failure Patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 27, 2010; 55(17): 1826 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berman, J. Parameshwar, D. P. Jenkins, K. Dhital, C. Lewis, K. Dempster, P. Lincoln, C. Sudarshan, S. R. Large, J. Dunning, et al. Thoratec implantable ventricular assist device: The Papworth experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2010; 139(2): 466 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Edmunds Jr Managing Fibrinolysis Without Aprotinin Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 324 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Pagani, L. W. Miller, S. D. Russell, K. D. Aaronson, R. John, A. J. Boyle, J. V. Conte, R. C. Bogaev, T. E. MacGillivray, Y. Naka, et al. Extended Mechanical Circulatory Support With a Continuous-Flow Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Device J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 312 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Eisen and S. R. Hankins Continuous Flow Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Device: Mechanical Circulatory Support 2.0 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 322 - 324. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Nicolini and T. Gherli Alternatives to transplantation in the surgical therapy for heart failure Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 214 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. John, F. Kamdar, K. Liao, M. Colvin-Adams, L. Miller, L. Joyce, and A. Boyle Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1318 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. John, F. Kamdar, K. Liao, M. Colvin-Adams, A. Boyle, and L. Joyce Improved Survival and Decreasing Incidence of Adverse Events With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge-to-Transplant Therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1227 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Osaki, N. M. Edwards, M. R. Johnson, and T. Kohmoto A novel use of the implantable ventricular assist device for isolated right heart failure Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, August 1, 2008; 7(4): 651 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |