HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Minoru Tabata Ramanan Umakanthan Zain Khalpey Sary F. Aranki Gregory S. Couper Lawrence H. Cohn Prem S. Shekar Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tabata, M. Articles by Shekar, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tabata, M. Articles by Shekar, P. S. Related Collections Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:165-169
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Evolving Technology

Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: Reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Received for publication October 3, 2006; revisions received January 14, 2007; accepted for publication January 23, 2007.

^_* Address for reprints: Prem Shekar, MD, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02446. (Email: pshekar{at}partners.org).

Objective: A hemisternotomy approach to minimal-access cardiac surgery is associated with a faster postoperative recovery because of reduced postoperative pain and improved respiratory function. Conversion to a full sternotomy is occasionally required for reasons that remain inadequately reported.

Methods: Between January 1996 and June 2005, 907 cardiac surgical patients were planned for an upper hemisternotomy and 528 for a lower hemisternotomy. We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who required conversion to a full sternotomy.

Results: Twenty-four (2.6%) of 907 patients required a conversion from upper hemisternotomy because of bleeding (n = 8), ventricular dysfunction (n = 5), refractory ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3), poor exposure (n = 2), and other causes (n = 6). Eight (33.3%) of 24 patients died perioperatively. Of the 883 patients who went on to have an operation through the upper hemisternotomy approach, the mortality was 1.7% (15/883). Twenty-one (4.0%) of 528 patients required conversion from a lower hemisternotomy because of poor exposure (n = 16), bleeding (n = 1), refractory ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3), and a retained venous cannula (n = 1). None of these patients died postoperatively. Of the 507 patients who went on to have an operation through the lower hemisternotomy approach, the mortality was 1.2% (6/507).

Conclusion: Conversion to a full sternotomy occurs infrequently during minimal-access cardiac surgery. Upper hemisternotomy conversions are usually urgent after crossclamp removal and are often associated with serious morbidity and mortality. Conversely, lower hemisternotomy conversions are performed electively in the prebypass period because of poor exposure and are not associated with complications.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, L. H. Cohn, R. M. Bolman III, P. S. Shekar, F. Y. Chen, G. S. Couper, and S. F. Aranki Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 537 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Murtuza, J. R. Pepper, R. DeL Stanbridge, C. Jones, C. Rao, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Worth It? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1121 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]