JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Charles T. Klodell, Jr
David C. McGiffin
Benjamin Sun
William T. Abraham
Walter E. Pae, Jr
Christof Huth
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klodell, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Huth, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klodell, C. T., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Huth, C.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:188-195
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Evolving Technology

Worldwide surgical experience with the Paracor HeartNet cardiac restraint device

Charles T. Klodell, Jr, MDa,*, Juan M. Aranda, Jr, MDb, David C. McGiffin, MDc, Barry K. Rayburn, MDd, Benjamin Sun, MDe, William T. Abraham, MDf, Walter E. Pae, Jr, MDg, John P. Boehmer, MDh, Helmut Klein, MDi, Christof Huth, MDj

a Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla
b Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla
c Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala
d Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala
e Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
f Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
g Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Penn
h Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Penn
i Department of Cardiology, Universitatsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
j Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Presented at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5–9, 2007.

Received for publication May 4, 2007; revisions received August 12, 2007; accepted for publication September 20, 2007.

* Address for reprints: Charles T. Klodell, MD, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, PO Box 100286, Gainesville, FL 32610. (Email: Klodell{at}surgery.ufl.edu).

Objective: An elastic ventricular restraint device has been developed for patients with heart failure who remain symptomatic despite treatment with standard therapies. The safety and efficacy of this device are under clinical investigation. Six-month data for the first 51 patients treated worldwide are reported. We hypothesize that the Paracor HeartNet device (Paracor Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif), placed through a minithoracotomy in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy, improves clinical and functional status.

Methods: Fifty-one patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less, with a New York Heart Association class II or III, and receiving optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, were selected at 15 sites (3 in Europe, 12 in the United States) to undergo implantation of the HeartNet device through a minithoracotomy. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6-month follow-up by echocardiography, the 6-minute walk test, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (partial oxygen pressure in mixed venous blood), New York Heart Association class, and (in the United States) the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire.

Results: The average age was 52 years (30–73 years), with a preponderance of men and nonischemic cause of heart failure. Implantation was accomplished in 50 of 51 patients (98%). Adverse events included 2 in-hospital deaths secondary to pulmonary complications (4%), additional pulmonary complications in 7 patients (14%), arrhythmia in 14 patients (27%), epicardial laceration in 2 patients (4%), and empyema in 1 patient (2%). Six-month data demonstrated significant improvement in the 6-minute walk test (+65.7, P = .002) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scores (–15.7, P = .002) and improvement in echocardiographic findings.

Conclusion: The Paracor HeartNet device can be reliably implanted in patients with heart failure and marked reduction of left ventricular function. These data suggest a functional and clinical benefit, with a trend toward reverse remodeling, and support the conduct of a randomized controlled pivotal trial.



Abbreviations and Acronyms LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; NYHA = New York Heart Association








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.