|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:188-195
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Evolving Technology |
a Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla
b Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla
c Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala
d Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala
e Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
f Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
g Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Penn
h Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Penn
i Department of Cardiology, Universitatsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
j Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Presented at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5–9, 2007.
Received for publication May 4, 2007; revisions received August 12, 2007; accepted for publication September 20, 2007. * Address for reprints: Charles T. Klodell, MD, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, PO Box 100286, Gainesville, FL 32610. (Email: Klodell{at}surgery.ufl.edu).
Objective: An elastic ventricular restraint device has been developed for patients with heart failure who remain symptomatic despite treatment with standard therapies. The safety and efficacy of this device are under clinical investigation. Six-month data for the first 51 patients treated worldwide are reported. We hypothesize that the Paracor HeartNet device (Paracor Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif), placed through a minithoracotomy in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy, improves clinical and functional status.
Methods: Fifty-one patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less, with a New York Heart Association class II or III, and receiving optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, were selected at 15 sites (3 in Europe, 12 in the United States) to undergo implantation of the HeartNet device through a minithoracotomy. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6-month follow-up by echocardiography, the 6-minute walk test, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (partial oxygen pressure in mixed venous blood), New York Heart Association class, and (in the United States) the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire.
Results: The average age was 52 years (30–73 years), with a preponderance of men and nonischemic cause of heart failure. Implantation was accomplished in 50 of 51 patients (98%). Adverse events included 2 in-hospital deaths secondary to pulmonary complications (4%), additional pulmonary complications in 7 patients (14%), arrhythmia in 14 patients (27%), epicardial laceration in 2 patients (4%), and empyema in 1 patient (2%). Six-month data demonstrated significant improvement in the 6-minute walk test (+65.7, P = .002) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scores (–15.7, P = .002) and improvement in echocardiographic findings.
Conclusion: The Paracor HeartNet device can be reliably implanted in patients with heart failure and marked reduction of left ventricular function. These data suggest a functional and clinical benefit, with a trend toward reverse remodeling, and support the conduct of a randomized controlled pivotal trial.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. P. Kerckhoffs, J. H. Omens, and A. D. McCulloch Mechanical discoordination increases continuously after the onset of left bundle branch block despite constant electrical dyssynchrony in a computational model of cardiac electromechanics and growth Europace, November 1, 2012; 14(suppl_5): v65 - v72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Kwon, M. Cevasco, J. D. Schmitto, and F. Y. Chen Ventricular restraint therapy for heart failure: A review, summary of state of the art, and future directions J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2012; 144(4): 771 - 777.e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Dixon, A. M. Goodman, W. F. Gaillard II, W. T. Rivers, R. A. McKinney, R. Mukherjee, N. L. Baker, J. S. Ikonomidis, and F. G. Spinale Hemodynamics and myocardial blood flow patterns after placement of a cardiac passive restraint device in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2011; 142(5): 1038 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Pepper 50 Revascularization and remodelling surgery Oxford Textbook of Heart Failure, January 1, 2011; 1(1): med-9780199577729-chapter - med-9780199577729-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Thompson, K. J. Philip, A. Barbagelata, and E. R. Schwarz Review Article: The New Concept of Interventional Heart Failure Therapy--Part 1: Electrical Therapy, Treatment of CAD, Fluid Removal, and Ventricular Support Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 1, 2010; 15(2): 102 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |