HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Robert James Cerfolio Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cerfolio, R. J. Articles by Bryant, A. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cerfolio, R. J. Articles by Bryant, A. S. Related Collections Lung - cancer Lung - other

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:269-273
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

General Thoracic Surgery

Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output

^a Section of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
^b Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala

Received for publication June 25, 2007; revisions received August 7, 2007; accepted for publication August 17, 2007.

^_* Address correspondence to: Robert J. Cerfolio, MD, Professor of Surgery, Chief of Section of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19^th St S, ZRB 739, Birmingham, AL 35294. (Email: rcerfolio{at}uab.edu).

Objective: Many patients have their hospital discharge delayed because their chest tube drainage is too high, despite the fact that there are no data to support the commonly used 250 mL/day threshold.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with a prospective database and prospective algorithm from one surgeon. All patients underwent elective pulmonary resection. The last chest tube was removed if there was no air leak and nonchylous drainage of 450 mL/day or less.

Results: The study comprised 8608 operations and 2077 patients who underwent an elective (nonpneumonectomy) pulmonary resection via thoracotomy by one general thoracic surgeon over a 10-year period. Eighty-nine patients went home with a chest tube owing to air leak. The remaining 1988 patients were discharged without a chest tube. Types of pulmonary resection were wedge resection in 729 patients, segmentectomy in 214, lobectomy in 1104, and bilobectomy in 30. The median day of discharge was postoperative day 4. One hundred one (5%) were readmitted to the hospital within 60 days of discharge. The most common reason for readmission was dehydration and fatigue. Only 11 (0.55%) had readmissions owing to recurrent symptomatic effusion and most were treated with video-assisted thoracoscopy. Follow-up was 100% at 4 weeks and 93% at 8 weeks.

Conclusions: Chest tubes can be removed with up to 450 mL/day of nonchylous drainage after pulmonary resection, and perhaps a higher volume could be accepted. Readmission owing to a recurrent effusion is exceedingly uncommon, and the practice of leaving the tube in longer for drainage less than 450 mL/day is unsupported in the literature.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. E. Apostolakis and N. G. Baikoussis Single or double drain after lung resections? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 36(2): 424 - 424. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Cerfolio, D. J. Minnich, and A. S. Bryant The Removal of Chest Tubes Despite an Air Leak or a Pneumothorax. Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1690 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Nakanishi, Y. Fujino, T. Yamashita, and S. Oka A prospective study of the association between drainage volume within 24 hours after thoracoscopic lobectomy and postoperative morbidity. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2009; 137(6): 1394 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Cerfolio, T. McCarty, and A. S. Bryant Non-imaged pulmonary nodules discovered during thoracotomy for metastasectomy by lung palpation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 786 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Okur, V. Baysungur, C. Tezel, G. Sevilgen, G. Ergene, M. Gokce, and S. Halezeroglu Comparison of the single or double chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 32 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Whitson, S. S. Groth, S. J. Duval, S. J. Swanson, and M. A. Maddaus Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Approaches to Lobectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 2008 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Cerfolio and A. S. Bryant The Benefits of Continuous and Digital Air Leak Assessment After Elective Pulmonary Resection: A Prospective Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 396 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Ozdemir, A. K. Misirlioglu, and C. A. Kutlu Does the amount of fluid really matter for drain removal after lung resection? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 535 - 536. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Grodzki Prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output--is it valid everywhere? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 536 - 536. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Cerfolio Reply to the Editor: J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 536 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF]