HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Morgan L. Brown Hartzell V. Schaff Charles J. Mullany Thoralf M. Sundt Joseph A. Dearani Richard C. Daly Thomas A. Orszulak Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Brown, M. L. Articles by Orszulak, T. A. PubMed Articles by Brown, M. L. Articles by Orszulak, T. A. Related Collections Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:308-315
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

The benefits of early valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis

^a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
^b Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
^c Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Received for publication May 3, 2007; revisions received August 17, 2007; accepted for publication August 23, 2007.

^_* Address for reprints: Hartzell Schaff, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester MN 55905. (Email: schaff{at}mayo.edu).

Objective: The prevalence of aortic valve stenosis increases with age, and often the diagnosis is made by echocardiography before symptoms develop. To address the controversies in management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, we assessed the early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in these patients.

Methods: We analyzed data of 622 patients, aged 72 ± 11 years, with isolated asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Patients were identified with a peak systolic velocity of greater than 4 m/s by transthoracic echocardiography and monitored for the development of symptoms and need for aortic valve replacement.

Results: After the initial diagnosis, 166 (27%) patients who were initially asymptomatic experienced the development of chest pain, shortness of breath, or syncope and had aortic valve replacement at Mayo Clinic. Another 97 (16%) patients had aortic valve replacement in the absence of symptoms. Symptomatic patients were more likely to undergo coronary bypass grafting (P < .01) and have diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and a lower ejection fraction (P < .05 for each). Operative mortality was 2% for symptomatic patients and 1% for asymptomatic patients (P = .43). The survival of the 263 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement was not significantly different from an age- and sex-matched population (P = .99); 10-year survival was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57%–72%) for symptomatic patients and 64% (95% CI 54%–75%) for asymptomatic patients (P = .92). At 3 years after diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis, 52% (95% CI 48%–56%) of 622 patients had had symptoms develop, undergone aortic valve replacement, or died. Among the entire cohort, older age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.1 per year, P < .001), diabetes (HR 1.7, P < .001), decreased ejection fraction (HR 1.1 per 1%, P = .01), symptoms (HR 2.13, P < .001), and absence of aortic valve replacement (HR 3.53, P < .001) were identified as independent risk factors for mortality.

Conclusion: Among patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement, early and late outcomes were similarly good in patients who had symptoms before the operation compared with those who were asymptomatic. It is important to note that among patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, the omission of surgical treatment was the most important risk factor for late mortality.