HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Eric E. Roselli Gösta B. Pettersson Eugene H. Blackstone Mariano E. Brizzio Bruce W. Lytle Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roselli, E. E. Articles by Lytle, B. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Roselli, E. E. Articles by Lytle, B. W. Related Collections Cardiac - other

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:316-323
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Adverse events during reoperative cardiac surgery: Frequency, characterization, and rescue

Eric E. Roselli, MD^a,_*, Gösta B. Pettersson, MD, PhD^a,_*, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD^a,b,, Mariano E. Brizzio, MD^a, Penny L. Houghtaling, MS^b, Regina Hauck, MBA^a, Jacob M. Burke^a, Bruce W. Lytle, MD^a

^a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
^b Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Received for publication May 4, 2007; revisions received August 13, 2007; accepted for publication August 23, 2007.

^_* Address for reprints: Eric E. Roselli, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/Desk F24, Cleveland, OH 44195. (Email: roselle{at}ccf.org).

Objectives: To (1) determine frequency of occurrence and risk factors for intraoperative adverse events (IAE) during reoperative cardiac surgery, (2) characterize them with respect to structure injured, timing, and use of preventive strategies, and (3) identify the impact on outcome in terms of successful and unsuccessful rescue and cost.

Methods: Operative notes of 1847 patients undergoing reoperative cardiac surgery were reviewed to identify and characterize documented intraoperative adverse events. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify risk factors for intraoperative adverse events and outcomes. Expected versus observed poor outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, death) was used to measure rescue.

Results: Among 127 patients, 145 (7%) intraoperative adverse events occurred. These included injuries to bypass grafts (n = 47), heart (n = 38), and great vessels (n = 28) and ischemia without graft injury (n = 22). Most occurred on opening (n = 34, 23%) and during prebypass dissection (n = 57, 39%). Risk incremented as reoperations increased. Seventy-seven patients experienced 1 or more lapses in preventive strategies. Patients with intraoperative adverse events had a greater number of poor outcomes (n = 24 [19%] vs n = 107 [6.2%]; P < .0001) and incurred higher direct technical intraoperative and postoperative costs (ratio 1.3). Twelve patients with intraoperative adverse events were predicted to have poor outcomes versus 24 who did (P < .0001), indicating 12 "failures to rescue."

Conclusions: Adverse events still occur regularly during cardiac reoperation, are related to complexity of the procedure, and occur particularly during dissection and often when preventive strategies have not been used. Compensatory rescue measures are not always successful. Adverse events lead to poor patient outcome and higher cost.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Likosky, S. D. Surgenor, R. S. Kramer, L. Russo, B. J. Leavitt, M. J. Sorensen, R. E. Helm, G. L. Sardella, F. V. DiPierro, Y. R. Baribeau, et al. Effect of Prior Cardiac Operations on Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2011; 92(4): 1260 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Redlich, N. Khaladj, S. Peterss, M. Pichlmaier, M. Shrestha, L. Hoy, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Conventional aortic valve replacement in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of interventional approaches Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2011; 40(2): 455 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kaushal, S. K. Patel, S.-K. Goh, A. Sood, B. L. Walker, and C. L. Backer A novel combination of bioresorbable polymeric film and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene provides a protective barrier and reduces adhesions. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2011; 141(3): 789 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Roselli Engineering Transcatheter Aortic Valve Devices: A Surgeon's Perspective Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, March 1, 2011; 225(3): 207 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Park, R. M. Suri, H. M. Burkhart, K. L. Greason, J. A. Dearani, H. V. Schaff, and T. M. Sundt III Identifying patients at particular risk of injury during repeat sternotomy: Analysis of 2555 cardiac reoperations J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2010; 140(5): 1028 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Morales, E. Williams, and R. John Is resternotomy in cardiac surgery still a problem? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, September 1, 2010; 11(3): 277 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fukui, M. Tabata, S. Manabe, T. Shimokawa, S. Morita, and S. Takanashi Angiographic outcomes of right internal thoracic artery grafts in situ or as free grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2010; 139(4): 868 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Knapik, D. Ciesla, M. Wawrzynczyk, M. Knapik, J. Borkowski, and M. Zembala Incidence and prediction of permanent neurological deficits after cardiac surgery -- are the existing models of prediction truly global? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2010; 37(3): 717 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Akujuo, G. W. Fischer, and J. Chikwe Current Concepts in Reoperative Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2009; 13(4): 206 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. U. Khan and N. Yonan Does preoperative computed tomography reduce the risks associated with re-do cardiac surgery? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 119 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Smith, P. I. Ellman, P. W. Thompson, M. E. Girotti, B. A. Mettler, G. Ailawadi, B. B. Peeler, J. A. Kern, and I. L. Kron Do You Need to Clamp a Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery-Left Anterior Descending Graft in Reoperative Cardiac Surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 87(3): 742 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Khaladj, M. Shrestha, S. Peterss, I. Kutschka, M. Strueber, L. Hoy, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with patent grafts: is this old-fashioned technique obsolete? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 260 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Nakahira, T. Shibata, Y. Sasaki, H. Hirai, K. Hattori, M. Hosono, S. Ehara, and S. Suehiro Outcome After the Modified Bentall Technique With a Long Interposed Graft to the Left Coronary Artery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 109 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Nowicki, G. B. Pettersson, N. G. Smedira, E. E. Roselli, E. H. Blackstone, and B. W. Lytle Aortic Allograft Valve Reoperation: Surgical Challenges and Patient Risks Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G.T. Augoustides Adverse events in reoperative cardiac surgery: Delineating the typical intraoperative approach J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 235 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF]