JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ryan R. Davies
Mark J. Russo
Alan J. Moskowitz
Annetine C. Gelijns
Ralph S. Mosca
Jonathan M. Chen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:421-427
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiothoracic Transplantation

The use of mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients: An analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database

Ryan R. Davies, MDa, Mark J. Russo, MD, MSb, Kimberly N. Hong, MHSAb, Michael L. O'Byrne, BSa, David P. Cork, BSa, Alan J. Moskowitz, MDb, Annetine C. Gelijns, PhDb, Seema Mital, MDc, Ralph S. Mosca, MDa, Jonathan M. Chen, MDa,*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Hospital of New York–Presbyterian and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
b International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of New York–Presbyterian and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
c Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Children's Hospital of New York–Presbyterian and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York

Received for publication June 29, 2007; revisions received August 30, 2007; accepted for publication September 19, 2007.

* Address for reprints: Jonathan M. Chen, MD, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital of New York, 3959 Broadway, Suite 2-273, New York, NY 10032. (Email: jmc23{at}columbia.edu).

Objectives: The use of mechanical circulatory support to bridge pediatric patients to cardiac transplantation presents unique challenges because of the difficult anatomy and physiology in these patients.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing provided deidentifed patient-level data. The study population included 2532 transplantations performed on patients less than 19 years old in status 1/1A/1B between 1995 and 2005. Mechanical circulatory support was used in 431 patients: 241 (9.5%) received ventricular assist devices, 171 (6.8%) underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 19 (0.8%) received intra-aortic balloon pumps.

Results: Patients supported on ventricular assist devices had similar levels of hospitalization and intensive care use and less need for inotropic support (P < .0002) than had those not needing support. Five- and 10-year posttransplantation survival was better in patients receiving ventricular assist devices and patients not receiving mechanical circulatory support than in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or intra-aortic balloon pumping (P < .0001). Among mechanically supported patients, patients with a body surface area of less than 0.30 (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–2.43) and those requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–2.35) or intra-aortic balloon pumping (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–3.56) had higher long-term mortality. The use of a ventricular assist device at transplantation did not predict higher long-term, posttransplantation mortality.

Conclusions: Pediatric patients requiring a pretransplantation ventricular assist device have long-term survival similar to that of patients not receiving mechanical circulatory support. Early survival among patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and infants is poor, reinforcing the need for improvements in device design and physiologic management of infants and neonates.



Abbreviations and Acronyms BSA = body surface area; CI = confidence interval; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IABP = intra-aortic balloon pump; MCS = mechanical circulatory support; OR = odds ratio; UNOS = United Network for Organ Sharing; VAD = ventricular assist device





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
D. T. Haile and G. J. Schears
Optimal Time for Initiating Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2009; 13(3): 146 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.