HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Michael F. Reed Sandra L. Starnes Walter H. Merrill John A. Howington Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reed, M. F. Articles by Howington, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Reed, M. F. Articles by Howington, J. A. Related Collections Lung - cancer Education Minimally invasive surgery

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:376-382
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

General Thoracic Surgery

Thoracoscopic lobectomy: Introduction of a new technique into a thoracic surgery training program

^a Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
^b University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
^c Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

Received for publication June 21, 2007; revisions received February 12, 2008; accepted for publication May 5, 2008.

^_* Address for reprints: Michael F. Reed, MD, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert B. Sabin Way, PO Box 670558, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558. (Email: michael.reed{at}uc.edu).

Objective: Thoracoscopic lobectomy has been demonstrated to be safe and oncologically sound. However, few thoracic surgeons perform the operation. We hypothesized that use of a predetermined, stepwise plan for introduction of thoracoscopic lobectomy into a thoracic surgical training program would facilitate safe learning of the technique.

Methods: Databases from 2 affiliated institutions were queried to identify all lobectomies during a 4-year period. Our model for introduction of thoracoscopic lobectomy was established expertise in open lobectomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, participation in a formal thoracoscopic lobectomy course, stepwise introduction of specific techniques used in thoracoscopic lobectomy into the operative approach, proctoring of initial thoracoscopic lobectomies by partners, and teaching of the technique to other thoracic surgeons and residents.

Results: We performed 202 lobectomies: 97 open and 105 thoracoscopic. Mortality was 3.0%. The conversion rate from thoracoscopic to open thoracotomy was 13%. When divided into quartiles, the percentage of lobectomies performed thoracoscopically increased from 18% in the first quartile to 82% in the fourth quartile. With ongoing experience, the procedure was performed at higher frequency by new staff and trainees. Residents performed 0% of thoracoscopic lobectomies in the first quartile, increasing to 54% in the third quartile. In the fourth quartile residents and a new staff surgeon performed 76% of thoracoscopic lobectomies. A resident was the operating surgeon for 37 thoracoscopic lobectomies.

Conclusions: Introduction of thoracoscopic lobectomy into an academic thoracic surgical practice can be achieved safely if a stepwise transition is invoked. Training of thoracic surgical residents and additional staff can thus be effectively accomplished.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. M. Carter and M. B. Marshall Open lobectomy simulator is an effective tool for teaching thoracic surgical skills. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1546 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]