HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Nicholas Tepe Francis Shannon Jeffrey Altshuler Marc Sakwa Joseph Bassett Eric Hanson Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Evonich, R. F. Articles by Haines, D. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Evonich, R. F. Articles by Haines, D. E. Related Collections Cardiac - physiology Cardiac - other Congestive Heart Failure Electrophysiology - arrhythmias Related Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:915-921
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

The role of temporary biventricular pacing in the cardiac surgical patient with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function

William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan

Received for publication May 16, 2007; revisions received November 16, 2007; accepted for publication November 26, 2007.

^_* Address for reprints: David E. Haines, MD, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 West 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073. (Email: DHaines{at}beaumont.edu).

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the effects of atrial synchronous biventricular pacing in postoperative patients with severe cardiomyopathy.

Methods: Atrial synchronous biventricular pacing epicardial leads were placed during cardiac surgery in patients with an ejection fraction of 30% or less. Patients were randomized to usual care pacing, the mode determined by the surgeon (excluding atrial synchronous biventricular pacing) with a preference for no pacing or atrial pacing (atrial inhibited pacing); atrial synchronous right ventricular pacing; or atrial synchronous biventricular pacing. Pacing was continued until cessation of hemodynamic support. At 12 hours postoperatively, patients were randomly tested in each mode (atrial inhibited, atrial synchronous right ventricular, and atrial synchronous biventricular pacing), and thermodilution outputs were measured.

Results: Forty subjects were randomized. Groups were similar in age (66 ± 11 years), gender (85% were male), ejection fraction (23% ± 6%), QRS duration (111 ± 30 ms), and surgical indication. There was no difference in stroke index or cardiac index at 12 hours, duration of inotropic or intra-aortic balloon pump support, intensive care unit, or hospital length of stay. On comparative crossover testing, stroke volume was similar with atrial inhibited pacing and atrial synchronous biventricular pacing (59.3 ± 13.4 vs 57 ± 12.1, respectively, P = not significant); however, atrial synchronous right ventricular pacing was inferior (56 ± 12.9, P < .05 for comparison with atrial inhibited pacing). When compared with atrial inhibited pacing, atrial synchronous biventricular pacing showed a positive response in 17% of subjects (increase in stroke volume 5%), whereas 41% had a 5% or greater decrease in stroke volume.

Conclusion: Pacing mode affects stroke volume in patients with severe cardiomyopathy. Atrial synchronous biventricular pacing was helpful in a minority, but in 41% it compromised stroke volume.

Related Article

Biventricular pacing after cardiac surgery

Michael Flynn, John H. Dark, and Janet M. McComb
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009 138: 259-260. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Flynn, J. H. Dark, and J. M. McComb Biventricular pacing after cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2009; 138(1): 259 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]