JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yosuke Ishii
Takashi Nitta
Masami Ochi
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:998-1004
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Evolving Technology

Intraoperative verification of conduction block in atrial fibrillation surgery

Yosuke Ishii, MDa,*, Takashi Nitta, MDa, Masaru Kambe, MDa, Jiro Kurita, MDa, Masami Ochi, MDa, Yasushi Miyauchi, MDb, Kazuo Shimizu, MDa

a Nippon Medical School, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
b Nippon Medical School, Division of Cardiology, Tokyo, Japan

Received for publication December 30, 2007; revisions received April 27, 2008; accepted for publication June 10, 2008.

* Address for reprints: Yosuke Ishii, MD, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan. (Email: yosuke-i{at}nms.ac.jp).

Background: Atrial tachycardia is a troublesome and medically refractory complication after surgery for atrial fibrillation. Incomplete surgical ablation during atrial fibrillation surgery can result in residual conduction over the lesions and postoperative atrial tachycardia. Intraoperative verification of conduction block would detect incomplete ablation lesions and direct repeat ablations to prevent postoperative atrial tachycardia.

Methods: The incidence of postoperative atrial tachycardia was examined in 218 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation surgery between November of 1994 and October of 2007. No conduction block across any ablation lesions was confirmed intraoperatively in the first 128 patients (group C). Isolation of each pulmonary vein was verified by intraoperative pulmonary vein pacing in the following 72 patients (group PV). In the recent 18 consecutive patients, conduction block in the coronary sinus, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, was confirmed by intraoperative coronary sinus pacing (group PV/CS). Postoperative atrial tachycardia was characterized by electroanatomic mapping.

Results: The incidence of postoperative atrial tachycardia in groups C and PV was 7% and 1%, respectively (P = .0985). No patients exhibited any postoperative atrial tachycardia in group PV/CS. The postoperative electroanatomic mapping revealed that the mechanisms of the atrial tachycardia were macro-reentry through incomplete coronary sinus and mitral valve ablation lesions (n = 9), and focal activation in the coronary sinus (n = 1). Intraoperative verification of conduction block directed the repeat ablation lesions to the pulmonary veins.

Conclusion: The majority of postoperative atrial tachycardia was associated with an incomplete coronary sinus ablation. Intraoperative verification of conduction block may be helpful to prevent the occurrence of postoperative atrial tachycardia.

Abbreviations and Acronyms AF = atrial fibrillation; AT = atrial tachycardia; CS = Coronary sinus; PV = pulmonary vein; RF = radiofrequency






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.