HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Osman Al-Radi Andrew Redington Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grosse-Wortmann, L. Articles by van Arsdell, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Grosse-Wortmann, L. Articles by van Arsdell, G. Related Collections Congenital - acyanotic Congenital - cyanotic Great vessels Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:1429-1436
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Congenital Heart Disease

Borderline hypoplasia of the left ventricle in neonates: Insights for decision-making from functional assessment with magnetic resonance imaging

^a Labatt Family Heart Center at The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
^b Department of Pediatric Cardiology, RWTH University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany

Received for publication December 25, 2007; revisions received March 10, 2008; accepted for publication April 13, 2008.

^_* Address for reprints: Shi-Joon Yoo, MD, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. (Email: shi-joon.yoo{at}sickkids.ca).

Objectives: We sought to compare the usefulness of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging in neonates with a borderline small left ventricle.

Methods: The preoperative magnetic resonance and echocardiography studies of 20 consecutive patients (mean age 10 ± 9 days) undergoing magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. The diagnoses were aortic stenosis (n = 3), hypoplastic left heart complex (n = 12), and unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect (n = 5). The magnetic resonance imaging protocol included ventricular volumetry, flow measurements, and angiography. Potential left ventricular volumes, assuming an ideal geometric shape, were calculated by mathematically "unfolding" the compressed left ventricle.

Results: Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 16.0 ± 7.0 mL/m² of body surface area by echocardiography and 33.5 ± 15.5 mL/m² by magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiography consistently underestimated left ventricular volume and did not correlate with magnetic resonance. Of all echocardiographic parameters, mitral valve z-score was the best predictor of left ventricular end-diastolic volume by magnetic resonance (r = 0.77; P = .02). The average potential volume increase was 8.8% for aortic stenosis, 35.0% for atrioventricular septal defect and 23.0% for hypoplastic left heart complex patients. Aortic valve diameter did not correlate with flow volume in the ascending aorta. Sixteen (80%) of 20 patients underwent biventricular repair, without early mortality. Of these, only 5 (31.3%) had a preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic volume of more than 20 mL/m² by echocardiography.

Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging is feasible in neonates with borderline left ventricular hypoplasia. Echocardiography does not accurately measure left ventricular hypoplasia in these patients and may unfairly preclude some patients from a biventricular repair in whom magnetic resonance is reassuring.