|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:36-42
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
General Thoracic Surgery |
a Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
b Department of Biostatistics, Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
c Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
d Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
e Department of Social Work, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
f Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
g Department of Pathology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Received for publication March 29, 2007; revisions received September 24, 2008; accepted for publication September 30, 2008. * Address for reprints: Gail Darling, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Toronto General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, 9N-955, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada. (Email: gail.darling{at}uhn.on.ca).
Objective: We sought to determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical intervention on health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer.
Methods: Health-related quality of life was evaluated in a prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy in 52 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Esophagectomy was performed 6 weeks after completion of induction. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Esophageal scoring was performed before treatment, 7 weeks after initiation of neoadjuvant therapy, before resection, and at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year after resection.
Results: Forty-three patients completed the entire treatment protocol. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Esophageal scores decreased significantly after chemoradiation at week 7 (120 vs 127 at baseline, P = .04) but returned to baseline levels before surgical intervention (127). Similarly, scores decreased significantly after surgical intervention (115 at 1 month, P = .02) but returned to baseline levels by 3 months postoperatively (127). At 1 year postoperatively, there was a statistically significant improvement in scores compared with those at baseline (139, P = .003). Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Esophageal scores continued to increase over time for patients who were alive at least 1 year after the operation with or without disease but were observed to significantly decrease in those who died within 1 year after the operation (P = .0001). An increase in quality of life was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (P = .04).
Conclusion: Neoadjuvant therapy has a significant effect on health-related quality of life, but this is transient, with recovery to baseline within 5 to 7 weeks after completion of induction therapy. Health-related quality of life decreases again after surgical intervention but returns to baseline levels within 3 months.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. H. Allum, J. M. Blazeby, S. M. Griffin, D. Cunningham, J. A. Jankowski, R. Wong, and On behalf of the Association of Upper Gastrointest Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer Gut, November 1, 2011; 60(11): 1449 - 1472. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. W. Courrech Staal, J. W. van Sandick, H. van Tinteren, A. Cats, and N. K. Aaronson Health-related quality of life in long-term esophageal cancer survivors after potentially curative treatment J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2010; 140(4): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |