HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): R. Scott McClure Lawrence H. Cohn Gregory S. Couper Sary F. Aranki Michael J. Davidson Frederick Y. Chen Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McClure, R. S. Articles by Chen, F. Y. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McClure, R. S. Articles by Chen, F. Y. Related Collections Minimally invasive surgery Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:70-75
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Early and late outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: An eleven-year experience in 707 patients

^a Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Boston, Mass
^b Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, Mass

Received for publication June 24, 2008; revisions received August 21, 2008; accepted for publication August 27, 2008.

^_* Address for reprints: Lawrence H. Cohn, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston MA, 02115. (Email: lcohn{at}partners.org).

Objective: This study analyzes a single institution experience with minimally invasive mitral valve repair and evaluates long-term surgical outcomes of morbidity, mortality, and rates of reoperation. Late follow-up of mitral regurgitation and left ventricular function were also assessed.

Methods: Between August 1996 and October 2007, minimally invasive mitral valve repair was performed in 713 patients (mean follow-up 5.7 years). Excluding 6 repairs with robotic assistance, an perspective analysis of the remaining 707 patients was carried forth. Mean age was 57 ± 13 years. Mean preoperative ejection fraction was 60% ± 10%. Surgical access was through a lower ministernotomy (74%), right parasternal incision (24%), right thoracotomy (1.4%), or upper ministernotomy (0.7%). Exposure of the mitral valve was through the left atrium in 58% of the cases and transeptal in 42%. A ring annuloplasty was incorporated into 680 (96%) of 707 repairs. The Kaplan–Meier and Student t test for paired samples were used for statistical analysis.

Results: There were 3 (0.4%) operative deaths. Perioperative morbidity included new-onset atrial fibrillation (20%), reoperation for bleeding (2%), stroke (1.9%), permanent pacemaker implantation (1.7%), deep sternal wound infection (0.7%), and aortic dissection (0.4%). Median hospital stay was 5 days. Only 31% of patients required blood transfusion during the hospital course. There were 49 (6.9%) late deaths and 34 (4.8%) failed repairs necessitating reoperation. At 11.2 years, survival was 83% (95% confidence intervals, 76.5–88.1); freedom from reoperation was 92% (95% confidence intervals, 86.2–94.9). Nine (1.3%) patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 2369 patient-years of echocardiography time were obtained in 544 patients (mean 4.36 years, range 0.47–11.09). Mean grade of mitral regurgitation decreased from 3.80 to 1.42 (P < .0001) Mean left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from 60.7% to 56.3% (P < .0001). Combined risk of death, reoperation, and recurrence of moderately severe to severe mitral regurgitation was 7.7% (43/555).

Conclusion: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair is safe, with low perioperative morbidity, low rates of recurrent mitral regurgitation, and low rates of reoperation and death at late follow-up.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Iribarne, R. Easterwood, M. J. Russo, Y. C. Wang, J. Yang, K. N. Hong, C. R. Smith, and M. Argenziano A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2011; 142(6): 1507 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Suri, H. M. Burkhart, R. C. Daly, J. A. Dearani, S. J. Park, T. M. Sundt III, Z. Li, M. Enriquez-Sarano, and H. V. Schaff Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: Establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2011; 142(5): 970 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Mihaljevic, C. M. Jarrett, A. M. Gillinov, S. J. Williams, P. A. DeVilliers, W. J. Stewart, L. G. Svensson, J. F. Sabik III, and E. H. Blackstone Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: Potential realized J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2011; 141(1): 72 - 80.e4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Iribarne, M. J. Russo, R. Easterwood, K. N. Hong, J. Yang, F. H. Cheema, C. R. Smith, and M. Argenziano Minimally Invasive Versus Sternotomy Approach for Mitral Valve Surgery: A Propensity Analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1471 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Iribarne, R. Easterwood, M. J. Russo, J. Yang, F. H. Cheema, C. R. Smith, and M. Argenziano Long-Term Outcomes With a Minimally Invasive Approach for Resection of Cardiac Masses Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2010; 90(4): 1251 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Mihaljevic, C. M. Jarrett, A. M. Gillinov, and E. H. Blackstone A novel running annuloplasty suture technique for robotically assisted mitral valve repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2010; 139(5): 1343 - 1344. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Enriquez-Sarano and T. M. Sundt III Early Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, February 16, 2010; 121(6): 804 - 812. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Manasse Cooks and recipes Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2009; 36(5): 787 - 790. [Full Text] [PDF]