|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:314-319
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Clinic of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
b Department of Mathematics, School of Science and Technology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
c Clinic for Thoracic, Heart, and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Received for publication March 27, 2008; revisions received June 17, 2008; accepted for publication August 5, 2008. * Address for reprints: Hans-H. Sievers, MD, Clinic of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Luebeck, Germany. (Email: h.sievers{at}herzchirurgie-luebeck.de).
Objective: Early results after aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction are excellent. Longer-term follow-up, especially with regard to aortic valve function, is required for further judgment of these techniques.
Methods: Between July of 1993 and September of 2006, 108 consecutive patients (mean age 53.0 ± 15.8 years) underwent the Yacoub operation (group Y) and 83 patients underwent the David operation (group D). Innovative multilevel hierarchic modeling methods were used to analyze aortic regurgitation over time.
Results: In general, aortic regurgitation increased with time in both groups. Factors associated with the development of a significant increase in aortic regurgitation were Marfan syndrome, concomitant cusp intervention, and preoperative aortic anulus dimension. In Marfan syndrome, the initial aortic regurgitation was higher in group Y versus group D (0.56 aortic regurgitation vs 0.29 aortic regurgitation, P = .049), whereas the mean annual progression rate of aortic regurgitation was marginally higher in group Y (0.132 aortic regurgitation vs 0.075 aortic regurgitation, P = .1). Concomitant cusp intervention was associated with a significant aortic regurgitation increase in both groups (P < .0001). There was a trend that smaller preoperative aortic annulus diameters in group D and larger diameters in group Y were associated with increased aortic regurgitation over time.
Conclusion: In regard to aortic regurgitation grade over time, patients with Marfan syndrome and a large preoperative aortic annulus diameter were better treated with the reimplantation technique, whereas those with a smaller diameter were better treated with the remodeling technique. Concomitant free-edge plication of prolapsing cusps was disadvantageous in both groups. Considering these factors may serve to improve the aortic valve longevity after valve-sparing aortic root surgery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Leontyev, C. Trommer, S. Subramanian, S. Lehmann, Y. Dmitrieva, M. Misfeld, F. W. Mohr, and M. A. Borger The outcome after aortic valve-sparing (David) operation in 179 patients: a single-centre experience Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 9, 2012; (2012) ezs011v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Carrel Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2011; 92(5): 1644 - 1645. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rahnavardi, T. D. Yan, P. G. Bannon, and M. K. Wilson Aortic valve-sparing operations in aortic root aneurysms: remodeling or reimplantation? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, August 1, 2011; 13(2): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, E. Arnaud-Crozat, O. Bouchot, F. Doguet, R. Hacini, R. Demaria, D. Chatel, G. Sleilaty, and M. Debauchez Remodeling of the aortic root combined to an expansible aortic ring annuloplasty MMCTS, January 1, 2011; 2011(0401): mmcts.2006.001958 - mmcts.2006.001958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. David, M. Maganti, and S. Armstrong Aortic root aneurysm: Principles of repair and long-term follow-up J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S14 - S19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Paulis, R. Scaffa, S. Nardella, D. Maselli, L. Weltert, F. Bertoldo, D. Pacini, F. Settepani, G. Tarelli, R. Gallotti, et al. Use of the Valsalva graft and long-term follow-up J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S23 - S27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, G. Sleilaty, E. A. Crozat, O. Bouchot, R. Hacini, D. Blin, F. Doguet, J.-P. Bessou, B. Albat, et al. An aortic ring: From physiologic reconstruction of the root to a standardized approach for aortic valve repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S28 - S35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, G. Sleilaty, O. Bouchot, E. Arnaud Crozat, D. Blin, C. Acar, and M. Debauchez An aortic ring to standardise aortic valve repair: preliminary results of a prospective multicentric cohort of 144 patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2010; 38(2): 147 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Knight, S. Baumuller, V. Kurtcuoglu, M. Turina, J. Turina, U. Schurr, D. Poulikakos, W. Marshall Jr., and H. Alkadhi Long-term follow-up, computed tomography, and computational fluid dynamics of the Cabrol procedure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2010; 139(6): 1602 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Matalanis, W. Y. Shi, and P. A. R. Hayward Correction of leaflet prolapse extends the spectrum of patients suitable for valve-sparing aortic root replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2010; 37(6): 1311 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Charitos, U. Stierle, H.-H. Sievers, and M. Misfeld Valve-sparing aortic root remodeling with partial preservation of the intact native aortic sinuses Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, September 1, 2009; 36(3): 589 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |