JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Click here to read this article as a CME activity


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Bahaaldin Alsoufi
Zohair Al-Halees
Brian W. McCrindle
Mamdouh Al-Ahmadi
Charles C. Canver
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alsoufi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fadel, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alsoufi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fadel, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:362-370
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Congenital Heart Disease

Mechanical valves versus the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement in children: Propensity-adjusted comparison of long-term outcomes

Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MDa,*, Zohair Al-Halees, MDa, Cedric Manlhiot, BScb, Brian W. McCrindle, MD, MPHb, Mamdouh Al-Ahmadi, MDa, Ahmed Sallehuddin, MDa, Charles C. Canver, MDa, Ziad Bulbul, MDa, Mansoor Joufan, MDa, Bahaa Fadel, MDa

a King Faisal Heart Institute, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
b Labatt Family Heart Center, the Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received for publication May 6, 2008; revisions received September 9, 2008; accepted for publication October 9, 2008.

* Address for reprints: Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MD, King Faisal Heart Institute (MBC 16), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, PO Box 3354, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 11211. (Email: balsoufi{at}hotmail.com).

Objective: We aimed to identify characteristics differentiating children undergoing aortic valve replacement by using mechanical prostheses versus the Ross procedure and to compare survival and the need for aortic valve reoperation after each procedure.

Methods: From 1983 to 2004, 346 children underwent aortic valve replacement (215 underwent the Ross procedure and 131 underwent placement of a mechanical prosthesis). Factors associated with procedure choice were used to construct a propensity score for use as a covariate in regression models to adjust for potential confounding by indication.

Results: Patients undergoing the Ross procedure were younger, more likely to have a congenital cause, and less likely to have a rheumatic or connective tissue cause. They had a lower frequency of regurgitation, required more annular enlargement, and had less concomitant cardiac surgery. Competing-risk analysis showed that 16 years after aortic valve replacement, 20% of patients had died without subsequent aortic valve replacement, 25% underwent second aortic valve replacement, and 55% remained alive without further replacement. After propensity adjustment, factors associated with early-phase death included mechanical valves and a nonrheumatic cause. Mechanical valves were also associated with constant-phase mortality. Repeated aortic valve replacement was associated with the Ross procedure and a rheumatic cause. Both factors were also associated with all-cause cardiac reoperation. In children receiving mechanical prostheses, younger age and smaller valve size were significant risk factors for death. Freedom from homograft replacement after the Ross procedure was 82% at 16 years of follow-up.

Conclusion: Results from this study showed good outcomes and an acceptable complication rate with both valve choices. Given the significantly increased risk of early and late death in younger children receiving smaller mechanical valves, the Ross procedure confers survival advantage in this age group at the expense of increased reoperation risk, especially in patients with a rheumatic cause.



Abbreviations and Acronyms AVR = aortic valve replacement; LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract; PE = parameter estimate; RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Alsoufi, C. Manlhiot, B. W. McCrindle, C. C. Canver, A. Sallehuddin, S. Al-Oufi, M. Joufan, and Z. Al-Halees
Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 36(1): 84 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.