|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1071-1076
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
b Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
Received for publication March 6, 2008; revisions received August 13, 2008; accepted for publication October 26, 2008. * Address for reprints: Rakesh M. Suri, MD, DPhil, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. (Email: suri.rakesh{at}mayo.edu).
Objective: Recovery of ventricular function after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation is often incomplete. We studied clinical and echocardiographic factors influencing return of normal left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral valve repair or replacement for mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse.
Methods: We evaluated 1063 patients who had mitral valve repair or replacement between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2000. A total of 2488 echocardiograms with follow-up ejection fractions were available for analysis.
Results: Of the patients, 761 were men, 924 had valve repair, and 85% underwent surgery during the study's second decade. Compared with patients who had the operation in the 1980s, patients who had surgery in the 1990s had significantly smaller preoperative left heart dimensions and a 2.4-fold greater likelihood of an ejection fraction more than 60% during follow-up. Factors independently associated with higher ejection fraction at follow-up included valve repair (vs replacement), freedom from preoperative myocardial infarction, operation in the 1990s, greater preoperative ejection fraction, and smaller left ventricular dimensions. Patients with an ejection fraction of less than 50% at discharge were 3.5-fold less likely to recover normal ejection fraction during long-term follow-up (P < .001). Patients had a greater likelihood of a follow-up ejection fraction more than 60% if preoperative ejection fraction was more than 65% (hazard ratio, 1.7) or left ventricular end-systolic dimension was less than 36 mm (hazard ratio, 2.0).
Conclusion: Early repair of mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse, before deterioration in left heart size or function, increases the likelihood of subsequent normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Tribouilloy, D. Rusinaru, C. Szymanski, S. Mezghani, A. Fournier, F. Levy, M. Peltier, A. Ben Ammar, D. Carmi, J.-P. Remadi, et al. Predicting left ventricular dysfunction after valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse: additive value of left ventricular end-systolic dimension to ejection fraction Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, September 1, 2011; 12(9): 702 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Adams, J. Chikwe, F. Filsoufi, and A. C. Anyanwu The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 29, 2011; 57(13): 1425 - 1444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hetzer and M. Dandel Early detection of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet is still a challenge Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2011; 32(6): 665 - 667. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Stulak, R. M. Suri, J. A. Dearani, H. M. Burkhart, T. M. Sundt III, M. Enriquez-Sarano, and H. V. Schaff Does early surgical intervention improve left ventricular mass regression after mitral valve repair for leaflet prolapse? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2011; 141(1): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Morris, J. J. Maleszewski, R. M. Suri, H. M. Burkhart, T. A. Foley, C. R. Bonnichsen, N. S. Anavekar, P. M. Young, E. E. Williamson, J. F. Glockner, et al. CT and MR Imaging of the Mitral Valve: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, October 1, 2010; 30(6): 1603 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takeda, K. Taniguchi, Y. Shudo, S. Kainuma, S. Hamada, H. Matsue, G. Matsumiya, and Y. Sawa Mechanism of Beneficial Effects of Restrictive Mitral Annuloplasty in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Functional Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, September 14, 2010; 122(11_suppl_1): S3 - S9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Adams, R. Rosenhek, and V. Falk Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2010; 31(16): 1958 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gillinov, T. Mihaljevic, E. H. Blackstone, K. George, L. G. Svensson, E. R. Nowicki, J. F. Sabik III, P. L. Houghtaling, and B. Griffin Should Patients With Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Delay Surgery Until Symptoms Develop? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Mann, R. Bogaev, and G. D. Buckberg Cardiac remodelling and myocardial recovery: lost in translation? Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2010; 12(8): 789 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sareyyupoglu, H. V. Schaff, R. M. Suri, H. M. Connolly, R. C. Daly, and T. A. Orszulak Safety and durability of mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet perforation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2010; 139(6): 1488 - 1493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg and The RESTORE Group Surgical planning for surgical ventricular restoration involves decision options on form versus disease Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2010; 37(5): 1100 - 1103. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Enriquez-Sarano and T. M. Sundt III Early Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, February 16, 2010; 121(6): 804 - 812. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Gillam and A. Schwartz Primum Non Nocere: The Case for Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic "Severe" Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, February 16, 2010; 121(6): 813 - 821. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |