JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
D. Craig Miller
Scott A. LeMaire
Thoralf M. Sundt, III
Joseph E. Bavaria
Joseph S. Coselli
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Volguina, I. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Volguina, I. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1124-1132
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Correction

Valve-sparing and valve-replacing techniques for aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: Analysis of early outcome

Irina V. Volguina, PhDa,*, D. Craig Miller, MDb, Scott A. LeMaire, MDa, Laura C. Palmero, MPHa, Xing Li Wang, MD, PhDa, Heidi M. Connolly, MDc, Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MDc, Joseph E. Bavaria, MDd, Harry C. Dietz, MDe, Dianna M. Milewicz, MD, PhDf, Joseph S. Coselli, MDa Aortic Valve Operative Outcomes in Marfan Patients study group

a Baylor College of Medicine and the Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Tex
b Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
c Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
d University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
e Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
f University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Tex

This article is a corrected and republished version of the article that originally appeared in J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:641-9. Received for publication May 6, 2008; revisions received October 9, 2008; accepted for publication November 15, 2008.

* Address for reprints: Irina V. Volguina, PhD, Baylor College of Medicine, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, One Baylor Plaza, BCM 390, Houston, TX 77030. (Email: volguina{at}bcm.edu).

Objective: A prospective, international registry study was initiated to provide contemporary comparative data on short-term clinical outcomes after aortic valve-sparing and aortic valve-replacing root operations in patients with Marfan syndrome. The purpose of this initial report is to describe the study design and to compare early outcomes in the first 151 enrolled patients.

Methods: We assessed 30-day outcomes in 151 patients who met strict Ghent diagnostic criteria for Marfan syndrome and underwent aortic root replacement with either valve-replacing (n = 46) or valve-sparing techniques (n = 105) at one of 18 participating centers. In the valve replacement group, a mechanical composite valve graft was used in 39 (85%) patients and a bioprosthetic valve in 7 (15%). In the valve-sparing group, David V procedures were performed in 57 (54%) patients, David I in 38 (36%), David IV in 8 (8%), Florida sleeve in 1 (1%), and Yacoub remodeling in 1 (1%).

Results: No in-hospital or 30-day deaths occurred. Despite longer crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times in the valve-sparing group, there were no significant between-group differences in postoperative complications. Thirty-day valve-related complications occurred in 2 (4%) patients undergoing valve replacement and in 3 (3%) undergoing valve-sparing procedures (P = .6).

Conclusions: The analysis of early outcomes revealed that valve-sparing techniques were the most common approach to root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome in these centers. The complexity of valve-sparing root replacement did not translate into any demonstrable adverse early outcomes. Subsequent analysis will compare the 3-year durability of these two surgical approaches.

Abbreviations and Acronyms AVR = aortic valve-replacing; AVS = aortic valve-sparing; DCC = Data Coordination Center; MFS = Marfan syndrome


Related Article

Valve-sparing and valve-replacing techniques for aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: Analysis of early outcome
Irina V. Volguina, D. Craig Miller, Scott A. LeMaire, Laura C. Palmero, Xing Li Wang, Heidi M. Connolly, Thoralf M. Sundt, III, Joseph E. Bavaria, Harry C. Dietz, Dianna M. Milewicz, Joseph S. Coselli Aortic Valve Operative Outcomes in Marfan Patients study group
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009 137: 641-649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.