JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yasutaka Hirata
Jonathan M. Chen
Jan M. Quaegebeur
Ralph S. Mosca
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mosca, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hirata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mosca, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1168-1172
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Congenital Heart Disease

The role of enucleation with or without septal myectomy for discrete subaortic stenosis

Yasutaka Hirata, MD*, Jonathan M. Chen, MD, Jan M. Quaegebeur, MD, Ralph S. Mosca, MD

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY

Received for publication June 25, 2008; revisions received October 1, 2008; accepted for publication November 24, 2008.

* Address for reprints: Yasutaka Hirata, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY. (Email: yh2240{at}columbia.edu).

Objective: Substantial controversy persists regarding the need and efficacy of a routine myectomy in the treatment of discrete subaortic stenosis. Although some believe myectomy more effectively relieves subaortic narrowing, this is uncertain, and complications, including heart block and aortic valve injury, are concerns. The aims of the study were as follows: (1) to analyze the role of enucleation for relief of subaortic stenosis and the risk factors associated with recurrence and reoperation and (2) to delineate the characteristics of the patients who might benefit from enucleation alone.

Methods: From January 1990 through May 2007, 221 patients with subaortic stenosis underwent biventricular repair. Of those, 106 patients had discrete subaortic stenosis. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient, as determined by means of transthoracic echocardiographic analysis, was 67.3 ± 29 mm Hg. Forty patients had previous operations for other intracardiac anomalies. Mean age at repair was 7 years. Sixty-one patients underwent isolated enucleation, and 45 patients underwent concomitant myectomy. Patients with recurrent subaortic stenosis whose first operation was performed elsewhere were excluded from analysis.

Results: There was 1 early death and 1 late death. The postoperative peak left ventricular outflow gradient decreased to 12.5 ± 12.9 mm Hg (P < .001). No patient had development of heart block or required a pacemaker. A recurrent gradient of greater than 30 mm Hg was found in 26 (27%) patients, and 8 (7.5%) patients had reoperations. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94.7% ± 1.8%, 89.6% ± 3.5%, and 84.8% ± 4.9%, respectively.Of those patients who had not undergone a previous cardiac operation, there were no significant differences in the rates of recurrence (28% vs 27%) or reoperation (4.7% vs 4.4%) between the enucleation group and the concomitant myectomy group. For the patients who had a previous cardiac operation, the concomitant myectomy group had a significantly lower rate of recurrence (44% for enucleation vs 13% for enucleation plus myectomy, P = .031).

Conclusions: For those patients undergoing primary operations for discrete subaortic stenosis, routine myectomy does not offer superior relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; enucleation alone provides good results in this selected population. However, in those patients with associated cardiac anomalies, concomitant additional myectomy is recommended.



Abbreviations and Acronyms CI = confidence interval; LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
F. Edwin, M. M. Tettey, K. Entsua-Mensah, and K. Frimpong-Boateng
eComment: Discrete subaortic stenosis following repair of atrioventricular septal defects
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 87 - 88.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.