|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1388-1393
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
General Thoracic Surgery |
a Department of Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
b Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
c Department of Medicine, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
d Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass
Received for publication October 25, 2008; revisions received December 18, 2008; accepted for publication February 1, 2009. * Address for reprints: Scott J. Swanson, MD, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Peter Bent Brigham Building 239, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. (Email: sjswanson{at}partners.org).
Objective: As thoracoscopic lobectomy becomes widely applied for treatment of non–small cell lung cancer, thoracoscopic segmentectomy remains controversial for patients with small stage I lung cancers. Questions remain regarding safety, morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rate. This study compared outcomes between thoracoscopic segmentectomy and lobectomy.
Methods: Retrospective review was undertaken of patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy for clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer between January 2002 and February 2008. Indications for segmentectomy were tumor smaller than 3 cm, limited pulmonary reserve, comorbidities, and peripheral tumor location.
Results: Thirty-one patients underwent segmentectomy and 113 underwent lobectomy. Patients after segmentectomy had worse mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second than after lobectomy (83% vs 92%, P = .04). There were no differences in mean number of nodes (10) and nodal stations (5) resected. Segmentectomy and lobectomy groups had similar median chest tube durations (2 vs 3 days, P = .18), stays (both 4 days), total complications, recurrence rates, and survivals at mean follow-ups of 22 and 21 months, respectively. Lobectomy group had 1 30-day death; segmentectomy group had none. There were 5 (17.2%) recurrences after segmentectomy and 23 (20.4%) after lobectomy (P = .71), with locoregional recurrence rates of 3.5% and 3.6%, respectively.
Conclusion: Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is a safe option for experienced thoracoscopic surgeons treating patients with small stage I lung cancers. No significant difference in oncologic outcome was seen between thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy. Lymph node dissection could be performed as effectively during segmentectomy as lobectomy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Donahue, C. R. Morse, D. A. Wigle, M. S. Allen, F. C. Nichols, K. R. Shen, C. Deschamps, and S. D. Cassivi Oncologic Efficacy of Anatomic Segmentectomy in Stage IA Lung Cancer Patients With T1a Tumors Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2012; 93(2): 381 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Van Schil, H. Asamura, V. W. Rusch, T. Mitsudomi, M. Tsuboi, E. Brambilla, and W. D. Travis Surgical implications of the new IASLC/ATS/ERS adenocarcinoma classification Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2012; 39(2): 478 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-i. Yamashita, K. Tokuishi, K. Anami, T. Moroga, M. Miyawaki, M. Chujo, S. Yamamoto, and K. Kawahara Thoracoscopic segmentectomy for T1 classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a single center experience Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 6, 2012; (2012) ezr254v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okada, Y. Tsutani, T. Ikeda, K. Misumi, K. Matsumoto, M. Yoshimura, and Y. Miyata Radical hybrid video-assisted thoracic segmentectomy: long-term results of minimally invasive anatomical sublobar resection for treating lung cancer Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 14(1): 5 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Whitson, S. S. Groth, R. S. Andrade, M. A. Maddaus, E. B. Habermann, and J. D'Cunha Survival After Lobectomy Versus Segmentectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2011; 92(6): 1943 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gossot, R. Ramos, E. Brian, C. Raynaud, P. Girard, and C. Strauss A totally thoracoscopic approach for pulmonary anatomic segmentectomies Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, April 1, 2011; 12(4): 529 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Oizumi, N. Kanauchi, H. Kato, M. Endoh, J. Suzuki, K. Fukaya, and M. Sadahiro Anatomic thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy under 3-dimensional multidetector computed tomography simulation: A report of 52 consecutive cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2011; 141(3): 678 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Swanson Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Segmentectomy: The Future of Surgery for Lung Cancer? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2010; 89(6): S2096 - S2097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Fernando, M. Schuchert, R. Landreneau, and B. T. Daly Approaching the High-Risk Patient: Sublobar Resection, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, or Radiofrequency Ablation Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2010; 89(6): S2123 - S2127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Leshnower, D. L. Miller, F. G. Fernandez, A. Pickens, and S. D. Force Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Segmentectomy: A Safe and Effective Procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2010; 89(5): 1571 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |