|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:125-132
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Evolving Technology/Basic Science |
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
b Department of Cardiothoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, the Wisconsin Heart Hospital, Milwaukee, Wis
c Scottsdale Healthcare Medical Center, Scottsdale, Ariz
d Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, St Michael's Medical Center, Newark, NJ
e Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, St Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wis
f Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rhönklinik Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany
g Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Herzzentrum Jena University, Jena, Germany
h Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig GmbH, Hannover, Germany
i Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
j Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Mainline Heart Health Center, Wynnewood, Pa
k Department of Cardiac Surgery, Herzzentrum Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Received for publication November 2, 2008; revisions received January 10, 2009; accepted for publication February 2, 2009. * Address for reprints: John D. Puskas, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree St, Crawford Long Hospital, 6th Floor, Medical Office Tower, Atlanta, GA 30308. (Email: john.puskas{at}emoryhealthcare.org).
Objective: During coronary surgery, proximal vein graft anastomoses have been performed by using an aortic partial occlusion clamp to allow for a hand-sewn anastomosis. The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the PAS-Port device (Cardica, Inc, Redwood City, Calif), which allows an automated proximal anastomosis to be performed without aortic clamping.
Methods: Between June 22, 2006, and March 22, 2007, 220 patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafting with at least 2 vein grafts were enrolled. Within each patient, 1 graft was randomly assigned to receive a PAS-Port device, and the other was assigned to receive a hand-sewn anastomosis to the ascending aorta. The primary end point was angiographic patency (<50% stenosis) 9 months after surgical intervention. Secondary end points included average time to complete each anastomosis and 9-month freedom from major adverse cardiac events.
Results: One hundred eighty-three patients received matched grafts that were angiographically assessed at 9 months. The 9-month graft patency was 82.0% (150/183) for hand-sewn and 80.3% (147/183) for PAS-Port grafts. The patency rate of PAS-Port anastomoses was statistically noninferior to that of hand-sewn anastomoses (95% lower confidence limit for difference, –7.95%). The freedom from major adverse cardiac events at 9 months was 97.7% for PAS-Port (95% confidence interval, 94.5%–99.0%) and 98.2% for hand-sewn (95% confidence interval, 95.1%–99.3%) grafts. The PAS-port device was associated with a 4.6 ± 3.9–minute reduction in anastomotic time compared with that seen with a hand-sewn anastomosis (P < .001).
Conclusions: The PAS-Port proximal anastomotic device produces an effective anastomosis with a 9-month patency rate that is comparable with that of a hand-sewn anastomosis. It allows for construction of a proximal anastomosis without aortic clamping and requires less time than a hand-sewn anastomosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Dohmen and R. Autschbach Reply to Puehler et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2012; 41(2): 462 - 463. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Zenati Reply to the editor. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2011; 142(2): 481 - 482. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Desai, S. Kiani, N. Thiruvanthan, S. Henkin, D. Kurian, P. Ziu, A. Brown, N. Patel, and R. Poston Impact of the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Vein Harvest on Conduit Quality and Early Graft Patency Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2011; 91(5): 1385 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takata, G. Watanabe, H. Ohtake, T. Ushijima, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kikuchi, and Y. Yamamoto Automatic aortic anastomosis with an innovative computer-controlled circular stapler for surgical treatment of aortic aneurysm J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2011; 141(5): 1265 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Zenati, A. L. Shroyer, J. F. Collins, B. Hattler, T. Ota, G. H. Almassi, M. Amidi, D. Novitzky, F. L. Grover, and A. F. Sonel Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2011; 141(2): 338 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dohmen, N. Hatam, A. Goetzenich, A. Mahnken, R. Autschbach, and J. Spillner PAS-Port(R) clampless proximal anastomotic device for coronary bypass surgery in porcelain aorta Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2011; 39(1): 49 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Demertzis, R. Trunfio, F. Faletra, R. Wyttenbach, and F. Siclari Sutureless Proximal Anastomosis Using the PAS-Port System: Six-Month Patency and Five-Year Follow-Up in "All-Comers" Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1507 - 1513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Dewey Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1513 - 1514. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |