JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arkalgud Sampath Kumar
Sachin Talwar
Anubhav Gupta
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:359-364
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Mitral valve replacement with the pulmonary autograft: Midterm results

Arkalgud Sampath Kumar, MCh*, Sachin Talwar, MCh, Anubhav Gupta, MCh

Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Received for publication July 12, 2008; revisions received September 21, 2008; accepted for publication November 25, 2008.

* Address for reprints: Arkalgud Sampath Kumar, MCh, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110 029, India. (Email: asampath_kumar{at}hotmail.com).

Objective: We performed mitral valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft using the technique described by us earlier and present the results.

Methods: Between August 2000 and July 2007, 19 patients (16 male patients; age, 30–58 years) with isolated calcific mitral stenosis (n = 16) or mixed mitral stenosis and regurgitation (n = 3) underwent mitral valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft. Sixteen patients were in New York Heart Association class III and 3 were in New York Heart Association class IV preoperatively. Eight patients were in atrial fibrillation. The autograft implantation was achieved by using a scalloped stent of polytetrafluoroethylene felt for external support of the autograft. No anticoagulants were prescribed.

Results: There were 3 early deaths, one each caused by ventricular dysfunction, ventricular arrhythmias, and autograft dehiscence requiring early reoperation. Follow-up of survivors ranged from 34 to 99 months (mean, 71.9 ± 18.2 months; median, 75 months). The mean valve area was 2.96 ± 0.9 cm2 (range, 2.2–4.3 cm2). Fourteen survivors are in New York Heart Association class I, and 2 are in NYHA class II; 4 continue to be in atrial fibrillation. Follow-up echocardiograms (n = 16), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 6), and cardiac catheterization (n = 4) have demonstrated no significant autograft and pulmonary homograft dysfunction. There were no late deaths or reoperations or thromboembolic complications.

Conclusions: Mitral valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft, a complex operation, can be performed in selected patients with acceptable results. The use of our technique of autograft implantation offers several advantages and avoids exposure of the scaffold to the bloodstream.



Abbreviations and Acronyms AF = atrial fibrillation; LA = left atrial; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; MVR = mitral valve replacement; PA–MVR = mitral valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.