JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Click here to read this article as a CME activity


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Bryan A. Whitson
Michael A. Maddaus
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groth, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maddaus, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Groth, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maddaus, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - cancer

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:612-620
© 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


General Thoracic Surgery

Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database

Shawn S. Groth, MDa, Beth A. Virnig, PhDb,c, Bryan A. Whitson, MDa, Todd E. DeFor, MSc, Zhong-ze Li, MSc, Todd M. Tuttle, MDa,c, Michael A. Maddaus, MDa,c,*

a University of Minnesota Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Foregut Surgery, Minneapolis, Minn
b University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, Minn
c University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minn

Received for publication November 12, 2008; revisions received May 27, 2009; accepted for publication July 6, 2009.

* Address for reprints: Michael A. Maddaus, MD, University of Minnesota Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, MMC 207, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. (Email: madda001{at}umn.edu).

Objective: We used a population-based cancer registry to examine the association between lymph node counts and mortality to determine the minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined as part of esophageal resection.

Methods: Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, we identified patients who had an esophagectomy for invasive esophageal carcinoma from 1988 through 2005 and who had a known number of lymph nodes examined pathologically. After stratifying patients (0, 1–11, 12–29, and 30 or more lymph nodes examined) based on a recursive partitioning analysis, we assessed the association between lymph nodes counts and mortality using the Kaplan-Meier method. To adjust for potential confounding covariates, we used a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results: Of the patients in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database with esophageal cancer, 4882 met our inclusion criteria. We noted a significant difference between the lymph node groups with regards to unadjusted all-cause (P < .0001) and cancer-specific mortality (P = .004). After adjusting for cancer registry, patient factors, tumor characteristics, and timing of radiation therapy, we noted a significant difference between the lymph node groups with regards to all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. Compared with patients who had no lymph node evaluation, only patients who had more than 12 lymph nodes examined had a significant improvement in mortality; patients who had 30 or more lymph nodes examined had significantly lower mortality rates than the other groups.

Conclusion: To maximize all-cause and cancer-specific survival, esophageal cancer patients should have at least 30 lymph nodes examined pathologically as part of esophageal resection.



Abbreviations and Acronyms AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; CI = confidence interval; GEJ = gastroesophageal junction; LN = lymph node; OR = odds ratio; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. A. Whitson, S. S. Groth, R. S. Andrade, M. A. Maddaus, E. B. Habermann, and J. D'Cunha
Survival After Lobectomy Versus Segmentectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2011; 92(6): 1943 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Compr Canc NetwHome page
R. E. Glasgow, D. H. Ilson, J. A. Hayman, H. Gerdes, M. F. Mulcahy, and J. A. Ajani
Modern Approaches to Localized Cancer of the Esophagus
J Natl Compr Canc Netw, August 1, 2011; 9(8): 902 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2010 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.