JTCS Medtronic Endurant
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B. G.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 74, 317-321, Copyright © 1977 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

The glutaraldehyde-treated heterograft valve: some engineering observations

FJ Thomson and BG Barratt-Boyes

Two commercially prepared, glutaraldehyde-treated porcine heterograft valves mounted on flexible stents have been tested in a pulsatile-flow water tunnel. Measurements of the radial deflections of the stent posts have been made for various applied pressures across the valve. A previous claim of 90 percent reduction in leaflet stress as a result of stent flexibility is of doubtful validity because the measurement technique used was inappropriate for the magnitude of strain involved. Photographs of the valve at various steady forward flow rates show that the leaflets do not open as readily as the antibiotic-treated homograft valve.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. L. Cox, N. Ad, K. Myers, M. Gharib, and R.C. Quijano
Tubular heart valves: A new tissue prosthesis design--Preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 520 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
M. Valente, M. Minarini, A. F. Maizza, U. Bortolotti, and G. Thiene
Heart valve bioprosthesis durability: a challenge to the new generation of porcine valves
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 1992; 6(Supplement_1): S82 - S90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. W. Angell, J. D. Angell, and A. Sywak
The Angell-Shiley Porcine Xenograft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1979; 28(6): 537 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. B. Pyle, J. E. Mayer Jr., W. G. Lindsay, C. R. Jorgensen, Y. Wang, and D. M. Nicoloff
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Lillehei-Kaster and Starr-Edwards Prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1978; 26(4): 336 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1977 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.