JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babb, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babb, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, M. J., Jr

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 81, 451-454, Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Predicting aortic valve prosthesis size. A step toward better matching of patient and prosthesis

JD Babb, GV Parr and MJ O'Neill Jr

We have developed a simple method of predicting aortic valve prosthesis size from supravalvular aortic cineangiograms, taken in the 30 degree right anterior oblique projection, during routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Measurements made on the aortogram were corrected to true size by means of a 1 cm2 grid reference plate filmed at the conclusion of the catheterization. This method was utilized prospectively to predict the anulus size in 26 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement alone or as part of a more extensive procedure. The catheterization prediction of anulus size was perfectly predictive of the prosthesis size used in eight of 26 (31%) cases, within 1 mm of the prosthesis size used in 20 of 26 (77%), and within one prosthesis size in all 26 (100%) cases. Comparing the measured anulus diameter to the actual prosthesis diameter yielded r = 0.93. When both systolic and diastolic frames were available for analysis, the diastolic frame was more accurately predictive than the systolic frame (diastolic r = 0.93; systolic r = 0.88), although both yielded acceptable results. Utilization of this method has significantly altered operative plans in four patients with a small anulus. Such preoperative assessment should allow improved matching of patient and valve prosthesis and thereby yield improved long-term results in aortic valve replacement.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.