JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mavroudis, C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mavroudis, C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, A. N.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 82, 49-57, Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Improved survival in management of empyema thoracis

C Mavroudis, JB Symmonds, H Minagi and AN Thomas

Empyema thoracis following pneumonia, trauma, and surgical procedures continues to be a source of major morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 100 patients treated for empyema thoracis at San Francisco General Hospital during the past 10 years. The causes of empyema in these patients were as follows: pneumonia 44%, trauma 24%, surgical and invasive procedures 15%, lung abscess 11%, and hematogenous spread 6%. Ten patients in this series died of sepsis from necrotizing pneumonia or overwhelming injuries caused by trauma. Streptococcus (31%), Staphylococcus (21%), and Bacteroides (15%) were the organisms most commonly isolated. Bacterial isolates were single in 55%, multiple 42%, and absent in 3%. The type of organism did not correlate with severity of disease or eventual requirement for thoracotomy, pleural debridement, or Eloesser procedure. Successful methods of treatment included aspiration in 9%, tube thoracostomy in 63%, pleural debridement and drainage in 7%, and an Eloesser procedure in 11%. Because our patients were often debilitated from chronic alcoholism, drug addiction, and major trauma, conservative management was initially tried. In most patients empyema resolved with tube thoracostomy. Pleural debridement should be reserved for patients with special problems such as multiple loculation or purulence inaccessible to percutaneous tube placement. the Eloesser procedure is indicated in patients who have an infected residual pleural space that persists despite adequate tube drainage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Alexiou, A. Goyal, R. K. Firmin, and M. St. J. Hickey
Is open thoracotomy still a good treatment option for the management of empyema in children?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 1854 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C W H Davies, F V Gleeson, and R J O Davies
BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(90002): ii18 - 28.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. W. H. DAVIES, S. E. KEARNEY, F. V. GLEESON, and R. J. O. DAVIES
Predictors of Outcome and Long-term Survival in Patients with Pleural Infection
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1999; 160(5): 1682 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
H.-C. Huang, H.-Y. Chang, C.-W. Chen, C.-H. Lee, and T.-R. Hsiue
Predicting Factors for Outcome of Tube Thoracostomy in Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion or Empyema
Chest, March 1, 1999; 115(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.