JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 82, 248-253, Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

The amylase-creatinine clearance ratio following cardiopulmonary bypass

WR Murray, S Mittra, D Mittra, LB Roberts and KM Taylor

The incidence of unexplained pancreatitis in patients dying after cardiac operations has been recorded as 16%, with evidence to implicate ischemia in the pathogenesis of the pancreatitis. Increased amylase--to- -creatinine clearance ratios (ACCR), suggesting pancreatic dysfunction, have been reported in patients following nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Pulsatile CPB is increasingly recognized to be a more physiological form of perfusion, particularly with respect to capillary blood flow. In this study the ACCR has been determined before, during, and after cardiac operations performed with both nonpulsatile and pulsatile CPB. Twenty patients undergoing elective cardiac operations were studied. Ten patients had nonpulsatile CPB (nonpulsatile group) and 10 had pulsatile CPB (pulsatile group). The two groups were comparable as regards perioperative variables and perfusion parameters. In both groups the ACCR was estimated preoperatively, on three occasions during the operation, and daily on the first 5 postoperative days. A significant elevation in ACCR was observed in nine of 10 patients in the nonpulsatile group but in only one of 10 patients in the pulsatile group (p less than 0.001). The significant improvement of ACCR stability following pulsatile CPB may indicate that this form of perfusion will reduce the risk of pancreatitis following cardiac operations performed with CPB.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
J. Desai and S. Ohri
Review article : Gastrointestinal damage following cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, July 1, 1990; 5(3): 161 - 168.
[PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
W.T. Vigneswaran, J.C.S. Pollock, M.P.G. Jamieson, B. Torsney, and G.H. Beastal
Plasma levels of glucose, insulin and cortisol in children undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion
Perfusion, January 1, 1989; 4(1): 33 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.