JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randall, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randall, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. B.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 82, 797-800, Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Hierarchy of supraventricular pacemakers

WC Randall, WH Wehrmacher and SB Jones

Definitive subsidiary atrial pacemakers (SAPs) exist within the crista terminalis and in the atrial free wall tissue at the junction of the inferior vena cava and the inferior right atrium. These pacemakers are capable of maintaining cardiac rhythm at a rate intermediate between that of the sinoatrial (SA) nodal and atrioventricular (AV) junctional pacemakers upon default of the normal SA nodal cells. The conventional concept of a single (junctional) escape mechanism needs to be updated by recognition of these SAP sites, which are under comprehensive autonomic regulation. A great variety of clinically important cardiac syndromes require understanding of the SAPs, not only for diagnostic significance but also for therapeutic consideration. SAPs differ from the SA pacemakers in that they possess intrinsically slower spontaneous rates and are less stable. There is early competition among them for instantaneous dominance. They are more responsive to both sympathetic and parasympathetic control, and they are initially more susceptible to underdrive stimulation by another pacemaker (whether artificial or natural) than are pacemakers with the SA node.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. C. Man, B. Knight, H.-F. Tse, F. Pelosi, G. F. Michaud, M. Flemming, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of inappropriate sinus tachycardia guided by activation mapping
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2000; 35(2): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Lee, J. M. Kalman, A. P. Fitzpatrick, L. M. Epstein, W. G. Fisher, J. E. Olgin, M. D. Lesh, and M. M. Scheinman
Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of the Sinus Node for "Inappropriate" Sinus Tachycardia
Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 2919 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. M. Kalman, R. J. Lee, W. G. Fisher, M. C. Chin, P. Ursell, C. A. Stillson, M. D. Lesh, and M. M. Scheinman
Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of Sinus Pacemaker Function Guided by Intracardiac Echocardiography
Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3070 - 3081.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.