HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Silverman, N. A. Articles by Feinberg, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Silverman, N. A. Articles by Feinberg, H.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 84, 406-412, Copyright © 1982 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Pulsatile reperfusion does not modify global myocardial ischemic injury

NA Silverman, S Levitsky, J Kohler, M Trenkner and H Feinberg

In an attempt to arbitrate the reputed clinical efficacy of pulsatile flow during reperfusion in minimizing ischemic injury, 32 mongrel dogs supported by normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass were subjected to 30 minutes (Groups IC and IP) or 60 minutes (Groups IIC and IIP) of global myocardial ischemia. The effect of pulsatile flow (P) initiated during 30 minutes of reperfusion on the recovery of myocardial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and creatine phosphate (CP) stores, coronary blood flow, and myocardial water content (MWC) was compared to the effect of linear reperfusion (C) in another group of animals. ATP stores, which significantly decreased to 43% and 53% of preischemic levels (Groups IC and IP, respectively, p less than 0.01) and 36% and 31% of control values (Groups IIC and IIP, respectively. p less than 0.001), did not increase with either pulsatile or linear reperfusion. CP stores, depleted 97% during ischemia in all groups, returned to preischemic levels regardless of the mode of reperfusion flow. Coronary blood flow measured 30 minutes after aortic unclamping was not significantly different from control flow in any group. MWC significantly decreased during ischemia from 80.5% +/- 0.8% to 76.5% +/- 1.1% in Group IC and from 81.8% +/- 1.2% to 76.8% +/- 0.8% in Groups IP (p less than 0.05) and returned to preischemic levels with reperfusion. However, following 60 minutes of ischemia, pulsatile reperfusion prevented the significant increase in MWC that accrued after linear reperfusion (80.7% +/- 1.5% to 84.0% +/- 0.7%, p less than 0.05). These data indicate that pulsatile reperfusion initiated after an ischemic injury that results in a 50% or greater depletion of myocardial ATP stores does not restore myocardial nucleotide levels or enhance coronary blood flow, although the pathological increase in MWC may be avoided.