JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gangemi, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gangemi, J. D.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 86, 222-225, Copyright © 1983 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Comparison of cefamandole and cefazolin during cardiopulmonary bypass

CS Bryan, CW Smith Jr, JP Sutton, WB Allen, R Blanding and JD Gangemi

In a randomized comparison, concentrations of cefazolin were found to exceed those of cefamandole in serum, atrial appendage, and sternal bone in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. No postoperative infections and no antibiotic-related complications occurred in either patient group.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
M.-R. Movahed, B. Kasravi, and C. S. Bryan
Prophylactic Use of Vancomycin in Adult Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2004; 9(1): 13 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Saginur, D. Croteau, and M. G. Bergeron
Comparative efficacy of teicoplanin and cefazolin for cardiac operation prophylaxis in 3027 patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2000; 120(6): 1120 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. M. Conklin, R. J. Gray, D. Neilson, P. Wong, D. K. Tomita, and J. M. Matloff
Determinants of Wound Infection Incidence after Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients Randomized to Receive Prophylactic Cefuroxime or Cefazolin
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1988; 46(2): 172 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. van Oeveren, J. Dankert, W. Wildevuur, and C. R. H. Wildevuur
Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment Prevents Infection after Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Study in Dogs
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1987; 43(5): 544 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
J. T. Johnson, V. L. Yu, E. N. Myers, R. L. Wagner, and B. A. Sigler
Cefazolin vs Moxalactam? A Double-blind Randomized Trial of Cephalosporins in Head and Neck Surgery
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, February 1, 1986; 112(2): 151 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PerfusionHome page
S. V Moran, F. Montiel, G. Acuna, J. Vergara, M. J Irarrazaval, G. Maturana, and J. Dubernet
Cephradine and cefazolin plasma levels during cardiac surgery
Perfusion, January 1, 1986; 1(1): 41 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. V. SANDERS, R. N. GREENBERG, and R. L. MARIER
Cefamandole and Cefoxitin
Ann Intern Med, July 1, 1985; 103(1): 70 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1983 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.