JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bahnson, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bahnson, H. T.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 87, 35-42, Copyright © 1984 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Powerful but limited immunosuppression for cardiac transplantation with cyclosporins and low-dose steroid

BP Griffith, RL Hardesty and HT Bahnson

Cyclosporin and low-dose prednisone provide powerful but limited immunosuppression for orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Optimal long- term survival was possible only with rescue therapy using rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) when myocyte necrosis could not be reversed with pulse steroid therapy. The continued absence of rejection following rescue therapy with RATG in six of the last 19 patients is responsible for the improved 79% cumulative survival rate at 9 months compared to the 61% cumulative survival rate at 1 year for the initial 23 patients. The difference is that among the latter group, seven patients had persistent histologic rejection with focal myocyte necrosis which was not reversed with pulse therapy of steroids (hydrocortisone) or an increased dose of maintenance prednisone (30 to 40 mg/day). Three of these seven died of acute rejection within 3 months and four died between 8 and 13 months. Consequently, the cumulative survival rate of these 23 patients at 2 years was 41%. The projected 2 year cumulative survival rate of the 19 patients should not decrease greatly, as new episodes of rejection have not occurred beyond 3 months in either group.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
B. T. Bethea, D. D. Yuh, J. V. Conte, and W. A. Baumgartner
Heart Transplantation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1427 - 1460.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. M. Pham, R. L. Kormos, R. J. Landreneau, A. Kawai, I. Gonzalez-Cancel, R. L. Hardesty, B. G. Hattler, and B. P. Griffith
Solid Tumors After Heart Transplantation: Lethality of Lung Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1623 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
W. A. Hall, A. J. Martinez, J. S. Dummer, B. P. Griffith, R. L. Hardesty, H. T. Bahnson, and L. D. Lunsford
Central Nervous System Infections in Heart and Heart-Lung Transplant Recipients
Arch Neurol, February 1, 1989; 46(2): 173 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. C. Baldwin
Lung Transplantation
JAMA, April 15, 1988; 259(15): 2286 - 2287.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1984 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.