|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 88, 193-207, Copyright © 1984 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
DC Miller, PE Oyer, RS Mitchell, EB Stinson, SW Jamieson, JC Baldwin and NE Shumway
The Starr-Edwards non-cloth-covered silicone ball (Model 1260) aortic valve
prosthesis has been widely used for over 15 years and remains a standard
against which newer values are compared. To define more completely the
performance characteristics of this prosthesis, this study (including 449
patients) analyzed the long-term function of this specific valve over a
cumulative total of 2,896 patient-years (pt-yrs) of follow-up which
extended beyond 13 years. Expressed in both actuarial (% [+/- standard
error of the mean] free at 10 years) and linearized (%/pt-yr) terms,
respectively, valve-related complications occurred at the following rates:
thromboembolism, 76 +/- 3 and 2.7; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 74 +/-
3 and 3.1; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 92 +/- 2 and 0.9; reoperation, 90
+/- 2 and 1.1; valve failure, 82 +/- 2 and 2.2; all valve-related morbidity
and mortality, 51 +/- 3 and 6.0; and valve-related death, 88 +/- 2 and 1.3.
Thirteen percent of hospital and 18% of late deaths were due to
valve-related causes. No case of structural failure was documented. This
prosthesis has an admirable structural durability record out to 13 years,
and its long-term performance is satisfactory, albeit not optimal. Despite
the indestructable design and construction of this mechanical valve
substitute, 12% +/- 2% of patients had died of valve-related complications
by 10 years, and fully 49% +/- 3% had had some form of serious
valve-related complication. The long-term data reported herein can be used
for analytical comparison when follow-up of patients with newer mechanical
prostheses and tissue bioprostheses reaches 10 years to elucidate whether
or not these newer valves truly represent improvements and which type of
valve substitute proffers the most possible net benefit to the patient.
ARTICLES
Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Kvidal, R Bergstrom, T Malm, and E Stahle Long-term follow-up of morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve prosthesis Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2000; 21(13): 1099 - 1111. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. L. Godje, T. Fischlein, K. Adelhard, G. Nollert, W. Klinner, and B. Reichart Thirty-Year Results of Starr-Edwards Prostheses in the Aortic and Mitral Position Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1997; 63(3): 613 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Orszulak, H. V. Schaff, F. J. Puga, G. K. Danielson, C. J. Mullany, B. J. Anderson, and D. M. Ilstrup Event Status of the Starr-Edwards Aortic Valve to 20 Years: A Benchmark for Comparison Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1997; 63(3): 620 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Akins Results With Mechanical Cardiac Valvular Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1836 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |