HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cohn, L. H. Articles by Collins, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cohn, L. H. Articles by Collins, J. J., Jr

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 88, 695-705, Copyright © 1984 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves

LH Cohn, EN Allred, VJ DiSesa, K Sawtelle, RJ Shemin and JJ Collins Jr

Aortic valve replacement was performed in 912 consecutive patients from January, 1972, to January, 1983. The 616 male and 296 female patients, whose ages ranged from 16 to 95 years (mean 60.6 years and median 63 years), received 663 bioprosthetic valves and 249 tilting disc valves. A higher incidence of Functional Class IV heart disease and ascending aortic aneurysms was noted in the group receiving the tilting disc valve. Six hundred fifty-seven patients had primarily aortic stenosis and 255 had primarily aortic regurgitation. Associated procedures were done in 308 patients (33%): 233 had coronary bypass grafting, 46 had replacement of ascending aortic aneurysms, and 29 had miscellaneous procedures. The overall operative mortality was 6.4% (59/912). The operative mortality was 4.5% (29/640) for isolated aortic valve replacement, 4.2% (21/233) for valve replacement plus coronary bypass, and 17% (8/46) for valve replacement plus replacement of an ascending aortic aneurysm. The mortality was 4.2% (20/663) for the group receiving bioprostheses and 12.4% (31/249) for those receiving tilting disc valves. The operative mortality for 1983 for all aortic valve replacement procedures was 2.1%; for isolated valve replacement, 1%; for valve replacement plus coronary bypass, 4.4%; and for valve replacement plus aortic aneurysm replacement, 0%. The long-term follow- up was analyzed as of Jan. 1, 1984, so that there was a minimum follow- up of 12 months (mean 55 months and median 51 months). The actuarial survival rate at 108 months for all patients was 67% +/- 2%; for valve replacement alone, 71% +/- 3%; for valve replacement plus coronary bypass, 58% +/- 7%; for valve replacement plus ascending aortic aneurysm replacement, 45% +/- 10%; for aortic stenosis, 70% +/- 3%; for aortic regurgitation, 61% +/- 4%; for Functional Classes I to III, 77% +/- 3%; for Class IV, 53% +/- 4%; for age less than 63 years, 75% +/- 3%; and for age greater than 63 years, 57% +/- 4%. At 108 months, the probability of freedom from thromboembolism was 85% +/- 3% after bioprosthetic valve replacement and 83% +/- 3% after replacement with a tilting disc valve (p = NS). The probability of freedom from hemorrhage at 108 months was 98.6% +/- 7% for the bioprosthetic valve group and 89% +/- 2% for the tilting disc valve group (p less than 0.001). The valve thrombosis rate was 0.34% per patient-year for the tilting disc valves and 0.07% per patient-year for the bioprostheses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, E. W. Steyerberg, L. A. van Herwerden, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers Choice of a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis for AVR: does CABG matter? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 688 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ennker, U. Rosendahl, I. C. Ennker, S. Bauer, and I. Florath Risk in Elderly Patients After Stentless Versus Stented Aortic Valve Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2003; 11(1): 37 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856. [Full Text]

				C. Huth, A. Friedl, A. Rost, and for the GELIA Study Investigator Group Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis: analysis of the GELIA Database (GELIA 4) Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2001; 3(suppl_Q): Q33 - Q38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Yun, C. F. Sintek, A. D. Fletcher, T. A. Pfeffer, G. S. Kochamba, M. R. Hyde, J. O. Torpoco, and S. Khonsari Aortic Valve Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis : Five-Year Experience Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-17 - II-23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Walther, C. Walther, V. Falk, A. Diegeler, R. Krakor, J. Schneider, R. Autschbach, and F. W. Mohr Early Clinical Results After Stentless Mitral Valve Implantation and Comparison With Conventional Valve Repair or Replacement Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-78 - II-83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. von Kodolitsch, O. Simic, A. Schwartz, C. Dresler, R. Loose, M. Staudt, J. Ostermeyer, A. Haverich, and C. A. Nienaber Predictors of Proximal Aortic Dissection at the Time of Aortic Valve Replacement Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-287 - II-294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Westaby, X. Y. Jin, T. Katsumata, A. Arifi, and P. Braidley Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: Versatility of theporcine aortic root J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1998; 116(3): 477 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Westaby, H. A. Huysmans, and T. E. David Stentless Aortic Bioprostheses: Compelling Data From the Second International Symposium Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1998; 65(1): 235 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. W. Mohr, T. Walther, M. Baryalei, V. Falk, R. Autschbach, A. Scheidt, and H. Dalichau The Toronto SPV Bioprosthesis: One-Year Results in 100 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1995; 60(1): 171 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. A. Orszulak, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, B. J. Anderson, D. M. Ilstrup, F. J. Puga, and G. K. Danielson Risk of Thromboembolism With the Aortic Carpentier-Edwards Bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1995; 59(2): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text]