|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 89, 358-368, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
DM Cosgrove, BW Lytle, CC Gill, LA Golding, RW Stewart, FD Loop and GW Williams
The bovine pericardial valve and the SupraAnnular valve have been developed
to improve the hemodynamic function of tissue valves. Hemodynamic
performances of the standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve, the
Carpentier-Edwards SupraAnnular valve, and the Carpentier- Edwards bovine
pericardial valve were compared in the aortic position. One hundred
patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were studied intraoperatively.
Mean gradient across the valve decreased for standard and pericardial
valves as valve size increased. At the same flow rate, the 23 mm
pericardial valve had larger valve orifice areas, higher performance
indices, and lower gradients than the 23 mm SupraAnnular valve. The
SupraAnnular valve is hemodynamically superior to the standard
Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. The Carpentier- Edwards
pericardial valve, however, is less obstructive in the aortic position than
either of the porcine valves.
ARTICLES
In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Narayan, B. C. Reeves, S. I.A. Rizvi, K. Shokrollahi, H. Ismail, G. D. Angelini, A. Nightingale, and M. Caputo Hemodynamic Evaluation and Midterm Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Size 19 Perimount Prosthetic Valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1799 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al. 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Stelzer Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Porcine and Pericardial Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 915 - 934. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nowell, E. Wilton, H. Markus, and M. Jahangiri Antithrombotic therapy following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 578 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, L. A. van Herwerden, W.R. E. Jamieson, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 29(3): 374 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, E. W. Steyerberg, L. A. van Herwerden, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers Prognosis After Aortic Valve Replacement With the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve: Use of Microsimulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 825 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gao, Y. Wu, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 384 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cohen Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 657 - 658. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Le Tourneau, A. Vincentelli, G. Fayad, C. Savoye, O. H. Fabre, A. Prat, and H. Warembourg Ten-year echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular prosthesis: a case-match study Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2010 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.R. E. Jamieson, M. T. Janusz, J. MacNab, and C. Henderson Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S282 - S284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Y. Jin and S. Westaby Pericardial and porcine stentless aortic valves: are they hemodynamically different? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S311 - S314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stahle Homograft--the optimal aortic valve substitute? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2000; 21(20): 1644 - 1647. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Le Tourneau, C. Savoye, E. P. McFadden, D. Grandmougin, H.-F. Carton, J.-L. Hennequin, A. Dubar, G. Fayad, and H. Warembourg Mid-Term Comparative Follow-Up After Aortic Valve Replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon Pericardial Prostheses Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-11 - II-16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Luciani, P. Bertolini, B. Vecchi, and A. Mazzucco Midterm results after aortic valve replacement with freehand stentless xenografts: a comparison of three prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1287 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Carpentier Aortic Valve Replacement With a Pericardial Bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 599 - 600. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Christakis, C. D. Joyner, C. D. Morgan, S. E. Fremes, K. J. Buth, J. Y. Sever, V. Rao, K. P. Panagiotopoulos, P. M. Murphy, and B. S. Goldman Left Ventricular Mass Regression Early After Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1996; 62(4): 1084 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Aupart, A. L. Sirinelli, F. F. Diemont, Y. A. Meurisse, X. B. Dreyfus, and M. A. Marchand The Last Generation of Pericardial Valves in the Aortic Position: Ten-Year Follow-up in 589 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1996; 61(2): 615 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Cosgrove, B. W. Lytle, P. C. Taylor, M. T. Camacho, R. W. Stewart, P. M. McCarthy, D. P. Miller, M. R. Piedmonte, and F. D. Loop The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Ten-year results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1995; 110(3): 651 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Moggio, R. W. Pooley, M. R. Sarabu, J. Christiana, A. W. Ho, and G. E. Reed Experience with the Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1994; 108(2): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Tingfei Xi, Fuying Liu, and Baoshu Xi Effect of Pretreatment with Epoxy Compounds on the Mechanical Properties of Bovine Pericardial Bioprosthetic Materials J Biomater Appl, January 1, 1992; 7(1): 61 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.G. Dumesnil and A.P. Yoganathan Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S34 - S38. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |