JTCS Medtronic Endurant
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, F. H., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, S. P.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 92, 859-865, Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Reoperative achalasia surgery [published erratum appears in J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987 Apr;93(4):559]

FH Ellis Jr, RE Crozier and SP Gibb

Forty-six patients with esophageal achalasia required reoperation between January 1970 and January 1986. Three of these patients required a second reoperative procedure, for a total of 49 reoperations. Indications for reoperation were inadequate myotomy, 17; gastroesophageal reflux, 14; concomitant antireflux operation, six; incorrect diagnosis, four; carcinoma of the esophagus, four; megaesophagus, three; and paraesophageal hernia, one. Various procedures were employed at the time of reoperation, including revision of the myotomy, takedown or revision of a previously performed wrap, fundoplication, and resection. Of the 48 patients available for follow- up study over an average postoperative period of 5 years, the condition of 38 (79%) was considered to have been improved by reoperation. The best results were obtained by revision or takedown of a previous wrap (an improvement rate of 88.9%) and radical resective procedures (89% to 100%). We conclude that for good results to be achieved after reoperative achalasia procedures, the preoperative diagnosis must be accurate, the operation should be performed early before the development of megaesophagus, and a short but complete esophagomyotomy must be performed, preferably without the addition of an antireflux procedure. Elimination or revision of a previously performed fundoplication can be expected to be followed by good results. The precise indications for radical resective procedures have yet to be defined clearly, but their wider application to carefully selected patients with postoperative achalasia seems justified.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. M. Eldaif, C. J. Mutrie, W. C. Rutledge, E. Lin, S. D. Force, J. I. Miller Jr, K. A. Mansour, and D. L. Miller
The Risk of Esophageal Resection After Esophagomyotomy for Achalasia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1558 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H.-S. Hsu, C.-Y. Wang, C.-C. Hsieh, and M.-H. Huang
Short-segment colon interposition for end-stage achalasia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1706 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. J. Devaney, M. D. Iannettoni, M. B. Orringer, and B. Marshall
Esophagectomy for achalasia: patient selection and clinical experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 854 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
M. G. Patti, D. Molena, P. M. Fisichella, K. Whang, H. Yamada, S. Perretta, and L. W. Way
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication for Achalasia: Analysis of Successes and Failures
Arch Surg, August 1, 2001; 136(8): 870 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. L. Miller, M. S. Allen, V. F. Trastek, C. Deschamps, and P. C. Pairolero
Esophageal resection for recurrent achalasia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 922 - 926.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. H. Peters, W. K. H. Kauer, P. F. Crookes, A. P. Ireland, C. G. Bremner, and T. R. DeMeester
Esophageal Resection With Colon Interposition for End-Stage Achalasia
Arch Surg, June 1, 1995; 130(6): 632 - 637.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. K. Ferguson
Achalasia: Current evaluation and therapy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1991; 52(2): 336 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. H. Ellis Jr
Esophagectomy for achalasia: Who, when, and how much?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1989; 47(3): 334 - 335.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Orringer and M. C. Stirling
Esophageal resection for achalasia: Indications and results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1989; 47(3): 340 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. H. Ellis Jr.
Treatment of Achalasia: A Continuing Controversy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1988; 45(5): 473 - 473.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.