|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 92, 944-949, Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
J Lavee, L Porat, A Smolinsky, J Hegesh, HN Neufeld and DA Goor
The results of membranectomy and deep myectomy in the left ventricular
outflow tract were compared to those of membranectomy and myotomy in 42
patients who underwent surgical repair of discrete and tunnel subaortic
stenosis. Fifteen consecutive patients (Group A) underwent membranectomy
and myotomy, and 27 consecutive patients (Group B) underwent membranectomy
and myectomy. Two patients of Group A and nine of Group B had tunnel
subaortic stenosis. The preoperative mean (+/- standard deviation) peak
systolic gradients across the left ventricular outflow tract in patients
with discrete subaortic stenosis types I and II were 64 +/- 29 mm Hg in
Group A and 52 +/- 3 mm Hg in Group B (p = not significant). In the
patients with tunnel subaortic stenosis the preoperative mean gradients
were 97 +/- 74 mm Hg in Group A and 73 +/- 26 mm Hg in Group B (p = not
significant). In patients with discrete subaortic stenosis types I and II,
postoperative catheterization at a mean follow-up of 21 months revealed
residual mean gradients of 29 +/- 24 mm Hg in Group A and 10 +/- 13 mm Hg
in Group B (p less than 0.01). In the patients with tunnel subaortic
stenosis, the postoperative mean gradients were 25 +/- 7 and 30 +/- 30 mm
Hg in Groups A and B, respectively (p = not significant). We conclude that
in the surgical management of discrete subaortic stenosis types I and II,
deep myectomy (in addition to membranectomy) produces better relief of the
left ventricular outflow obstruction than do membranectomy and myotomy. In
patients with tunnel subaortic stenosis myectomy is less effective than in
the non-tunnel type but still produces acceptable results and may delay
radical procedures to a later age.
ARTICLES
Myectomy versus myotomy as an adjunct to membranectomy in the surgical repair of discrete and tunnel subaortic stenosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Hirata, J. M. Chen, J. M. Quaegebeur, and R. S. Mosca The role of enucleation with or without septal myectomy for discrete subaortic stenosis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2009; 137(5): 1168 - 1172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dodge-Khatami, M. Schmid, V. Rousson, M. Fasnacht, C. Doell, U. Bauersfeld, and R. Pretre Risk factors for reoperation after relief of congenital subaortic stenosis Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2008; 33(5): 885 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Serraf, J. Zoghby, F. Lacour-Gayet, R. Houel, E. Belli, L. Galletti, and C. Planche SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SUBAORTIC STENOSIS: A SEVENTEEN-YEAR EXPERIENCE J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1999; 117(4): 669 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Lampros and A. Cobanoglu Discrete subaortic stenosis: an acquired heart disease Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, September 1, 1998; 14(3): 296 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lavee, A. Smolinsky, J. Hegesh, and D. A. Goor Discrete subaortic stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1993; 55(5): 1279 - 1280. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sreeram, G. R. Sutherland, A. J. J. C. Bogers, O. Stumper, J. Hess, E. Bos, and J. M. Quaegebeur Subaortic obstruction: Intraoperative echocardiography as an adjunct to operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1990; 50(4): 579 - 585. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Douville, R. M. Sade, F. A. Crawford Jr, and H. B. Wiles Subvalvar aortic stenosis: Timing of operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1990; 50(1): 29 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |