|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 93, 300-307, Copyright © 1987 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
M Carrier, JP Martineau, R Bonan and LC Pelletier
From 1980 to 1985, 154 Omniscience valve prostheses were implanted in 132
patients (mitral in 72, aortic in 33, and both in 27), 81 women and 51 men,
aged 22 to 72 years. There were 13 early deaths (30 day mortality of 9.8%)
and nine late deaths. The actuarial survival rate was 79.1% after 4 years,
and survival rates after aortic, mitral, and multiple valve replacement
were 71.8%, 80%, and 85.2%, respectively. After a postoperative follow-up
period averaging 27 months, 96% of the survivors were in Class I or II. The
linearized incidence of thromboembolism, hemorrhagic episodes, and
reoperation was 3.8%, 3.4%, and 2.3% per patient-year, respectively. After
4 years, freedom from valve-related mortality, valve-related mortality and
reoperation, thromboembolic episodes, and all valve-related complications
was 93%, 89%, 88%, and 70%. Moderate hemolysis with increases of
reticulocyte count and serum lactic dehydrogenase above normal values was
found in 80% of the patients, but only one had hemolytic anemia. In 22
patients, the maximal opening angle of the prosthetic disc averaged 54 +/-
11 degrees. Postoperative hemodynamic evaluation was obtained in five
patients with aortic prostheses and in 13 with mitral prostheses. Mean
aortic gradient and effective orifice area averaged 17.6 mm Hg and 1.2 cm2
at rest and increased to 18.8 mm Hg and 1.7 cm2 with exercise. With mitral
prostheses, these values averaged 6.5 mm Hg and 1.9 cm2 at rest and 15.4 mm
Hg and 2.1 cm2 with exercise. Thus excellent clinical improvement is
obtained with the Omniscience prosthesis; however, the hemodynamic
performance of the valve and opening of the tilting disc are suboptimal,
causing the prosthesis to be moderately obstructive to blood flow.
ARTICLES
Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the Omniscience prosthetic heart valve
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Edwards, G. B. Russell, A. F. Edwards, J. W. Hammon Jr, A. R. Cordell, and N. D. Kon Results of valve replacement with omniscience mechanical prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 665 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Mikhail and C. W. Akins Omniscience Valve Evolution and Literature Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1996; 62(2): 624 - 626. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Akins Results With Mechanical Cardiac Valvular Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1836 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |