JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breyer, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lemeshow, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breyer, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lemeshow, S.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 93, 512-522, Copyright © 1987 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Blood conservation for myocardial revascularization. Is it cost effective?

RH Breyer, RM Engelman, JA Rousou and S Lemeshow

A total of 284 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization were prospectively studied to determine if the use of intraoperative autotransfusion or intraoperative autotransfusion plus postoperative reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood decreased transfusion requirements and the use of one or both techniques was cost effective. The Haemonetics Cell Saver System was used for intraoperative autotransfusion and the Sorenson Receptaseal autotransfusion system for postoperative reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood. During Phase 1, the Cell Saver System was used for 57 patients and 93 patients served as a control group. During Phase 2, the Cell Saver System plus the autotransfusion system were used in 43 patients and 91 patients were in the control group. Separate parallel analyses to compare the blood conservation groups to control groups were conducted for each phase of the study. The patient groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, preoperative red cell mass, preoperative hematocrit value, number of bypasses, and use of internal mammary grafts. Blood conservation techniques resulted in significant reductions in the use of bank blood. During Phase 1, Cell Saver System patients received an average of 2.8 units of packed cells versus 4.7 units for control patients. Transfusion was avoided entirely in 14% of Cell Saver System patients compared to 3% of control patients. During Phase 2, patients subjected to both the Cell Saver System and the autotransfusion system received an average of 1 unit of packed red cells versus 3 units for control patients. Transfusion was required in only 42% of patients subjected to both the Cell Saver System and the autotransfusion system compared to 85% of control patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the use of the Cell Saver System in Phase 1 and the Cell Saver System and autotransfusion system in Phase 2 were each independently predictive of decreased transfusion requirements. The total "blood-related costs" (including cost for all bank blood products plus Receptaseal and Cell Saver System equipment) was slightly lower for the blood conservation patients in both Phase 1 ($555.00 versus $615.00, no significant difference) and Phase 2 ($373.00 versus $426.00, no significant difference). Intraoperative use of the Cell Saver System is associated with substantial savings of bank blood, and the addition of postoperative reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood results in further bank blood savings. The use of blood conservation techniques is cost effective; that is, the costs incurred for the blood conservation equipment are more than offset by the resultant dollar savings for blood products.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
L. Y. Lee, W. J. DeBois, K. H. Krieger, and O. W. Isom
Transfusion Therapy and Blood Conservation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 415 - 430.
[Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
E. Sirvinskas, A. Veikutiene, R. Benetis, P. Grybauskas, J. Andrejaitiene, V. Veikutis, and J. Surkus
Influence of early re-infusion of autologous shed mediastinal blood on clinical outcome after cardiac surgery
Perfusion, September 1, 2007; 22(5): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al.
Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. C. Arora, J.-F. Legare, K. J. Buth, J. A. Sullivan, and G. M. Hirsch
Identifying Patients at Risk of Intraoperative and Postoperative Transfusion in Isolated CABG: Toward Selective Conservation Strategies
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1547 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
L. Y. Lee, W. J. DeBois, K. H. Krieger, and O. W. Isom
Transfusion Therapy and Blood Conservation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 389 - 400.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. Salenger, J. S. Gammie, and T. J. Vander Salm
Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgical Patients
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 439 - 469.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Wilhelmi, U. Franke, T. Cohnert, P. Weber, J. Kaukemuller, S. Fischer, T. Wahlers, and A. Haverich
Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery without the routine application of blood products: is it feasible?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 19(5): 657 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Schmidt, P. E. Mortensen, S. L. Folsgaard, and E. A. Jensen
Autotransfusion After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Halves the Number of Patients Needing Blood Transfusion
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1996; 61(4): 1177 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
Bo Liu, A. Belboul, S. Larsson, and D. Roberts
Factors influencing haemostasis and blood transfusion in cardiac surgery
Perfusion, March 1, 1996; 11(2): 131 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
T. Sakert, W. Gil, I. Rosenberg, D. Carpellotti, K. Boss, T. Williams, J. Ferneding, and I. Christlieb
Cell saver efficacy for routine coronary artery bypass surgery
Perfusion, January 1, 1996; 11(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
E. Smith and Z. Rayter
Postoperative autotransfusion of mediastinal blood: a review
Perfusion, January 1, 1990; 5(1_suppl): 25 - 30.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1987 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.