HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohr, R. Articles by Goor, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohr, R. Articles by Goor, D. A.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 94, 286-290, Copyright © 1987 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Inaccuracy of radial artery pressure measurement after cardiac operations

R Mohr, J Lavee and DA Goor

The phenomenon of a pressure gradient between central and radial arteries was evaluated in 48 patients immediately after coronary artery bypass operations. All were in stable hemodynamic condition, none receiving catecholamine support. In eight patients (Group A) mean femoral pressure was significantly higher than mean radial pressure (range 10 to 30 mm Hg). In the remaining 40 (Group B) radial and femoral pressures were equal. Mean cardiac index (thermodilution) was 3.3 +/- 0.68 versus 2.1 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2, systemic vascular resistance 1,181 +/- 218.4 versus 2,049 +/- 501 dynes/sec/cm-5, toe temperature 23.8 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees C versus 24.02 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees C, core temperature 33.9 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees C versus 34.1 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees C, mixed venous oxygen saturation 78% +/- 3% versus 62% +/- 5%, and peak radial dP/dt 1,485 +/- 366 versus 2,028 +/- 392 in Groups A and B, respectively. These data indicate, first, that the low radial pressures measured in Group A patients did not represent the true central aortic pressures; that is, they were false. Second, these low pressures had nothing to do with compromised cardiac function; rather, they were due to peripheral constriction and volume factors and also probably to proximal shunting. It is therefore recommended that while the chest is still open, if a discrepancy exists between a low radial artery pressure, a high palpable aortic pressure, and a satisfactory cardiac contraction, a femoral cannula for pressure measurement should be inserted. Treatment is by blood infusion until the femoral-radial gradient has been abolished.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. R. Manecke Jr, W. C. Wilson, W. R. Auger, and S. W. Jamieson Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2005; 9(3): 189 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Coleman, M. Hargrove, and T. Aherne Arterial pressure-gradient estimation postcardiopulmonary bypass using a Tycos gauge Perfusion, September 1, 1995; 10(5): 347 - 349. [PDF]

				E. A Hessel II Review article : What's new in monitoring the coronary surgery patient? Perfusion, July 1, 1992; 7(3): 161 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]