JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antunes, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antunes, M. J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 98, 485-491, Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?

MJ Antunes
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Hospital, Republic of South Africa.

The controversy surrounding the choice of a prosthesis for valve replacement in the elderly patient prompted me to review the performance of mechanical (Medtronic Hall [Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.] and St. Jude Medical [St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.]) valves implanted in 213 patients 65 years and older (mean 70.4 years) from 1980 to 1985. There were 63 mitral, 131 aortic, and 19 double (aortic and mitral) valve replacements. Most patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had stenotic lesions, but half of the patients in the mitral valve replacement group had regurgitation with or without stenosis. Early mortality rates for mitral, aortic, and double valve replacement were 4.8%, 6.1%, and 21.1%, respectively (p less than 0.01). The mortality rate for patients 65 to 74 years old was 6.5% and that for those older than 75 years was 9.1%. The cumulative follow-up for the survivors was 850 patient-years. The late mortality rate was 8.1% per patient-year but was valve-related in only 1.3% per patient- year. Noncardiac causes accounted for 43.5% of the late deaths. The late mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had regurgitant lesions than in those who had stenotic or mixed disease. It was also higher in the older patients (10.3% per patient-year) than in the younger group (7.6% per patient-year; p less than 0.05). Reoperation was required in only six patients (0.7% per patient-year). Thrombotic obstruction of the prosthesis and systemic thromboembolism occurred at linearized rates of 0.6% per patient-year and 2.5% per patient year, respectively, and significant anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at a rate of 0.6% per patient-year. With the exception of late mortality, the incidence of all late complications was similar to that of patients younger than 65 years operated on during the same period. Actuarially, global survival (58% +/- 4%) and freedom from reoperation (95% +/- 2%), from thrombotic obstruction (96% +/- 1%), from thromboembolism (92% +/- 2%), from all valve-related mortality and morbidity (82% +/- 3%), and from valve failure (93% +/- 2%) were also similar to those of the younger patients. Mechanical prostheses perform well in elderly patients. I could not confirm an increase in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic episodes, and the respective mortality and morbidity indexes were similar to those observed in younger patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. A. Grossi, P. K. Zakow, M. Sussman, A. C. Galloway, J. Delianides, G. Baumann, and S. B. Colvin
Late results of mitral valve reconstruction in the elderly
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1224 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, and A. Starr
Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients: Influence of Concomitant Coronary Grafting on Late Survival
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1746 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, H. L. Gately, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr
Up to Thirty-Year Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement in the Small Aortic Root
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1995; 59(5): 1056 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.