HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bojar, R. M. Articles by Cleveland, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bojar, R. M. Articles by Cleveland, R. J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 98, 1087-1095, Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve in the small aortic root. Results in 117 patients with 17 and 19 mm valves

RM Bojar, JT Diehl, M Moten, DD Payne, H Rastegar, JJ Stetz, NG Pandian and RJ Cleveland
Department of Surgery (Cardiothoracic), New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111.

The Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve was our bioprosthetic valve of choice between 1981 and 1985 for patients in whom the aortic anulus could not accept a valve larger than 19 mm in outer diameter or in whom the avoidance of warfarin sodium (Coumadin) was important. A series of 117 consecutive patients who received 17 or 19 mm valves for isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting or other valvular procedures was analyzed. Overall, 74% of the patients were female, with a mean age of 70.9 years and a body surface area of 1.67 +/- 0.19 m2; 92.3% were in New York Heart Association class III-IV, and the operation was urgent or emergent in 46%. The operative mortality rate was 7.7%, with no deaths in patients undergoing isolated elective first-time aortic valve replacement. Mean follow-up for survivors was 2.5 years (10 to 62 months). There were 20 late deaths, of which three were valve related, three were due to sudden death or arrhythmias, and two were due to persistent heart failure. The actuarial survival rate at 5 years was 68%. Clinical follow-up revealed a low incidence of valve-related complications, and 96.4% of survivors were in class I-II. Postoperative echocardiography before hospital discharge revealed a maximum instantaneous gradient of 18.4 +/- 3.0 mm Hg in five patients having a 17 mm valve and 31.3 +/- 12.7 mm Hg in 20 patients having a 19 mm valve. Doppler echocardiography was performed in 22 patients at a mean follow-up of 39.3 +/- 11.7 months. The maximum instantaneous gradient was 25 +/- 17.2 mm Hg for 17 mm and 17.41 +/- 5.4 mm Hg for 19 mm valves at late follow-up. The effective orifice area was 0.85 +/- 0.1 cm2 for 17 mm and 1.21 +/- 0.21 cm2 for 19 mm valves. This study defines the normal range of Doppler echocardiographic transprosthetic gradients for the Ionescu-Shiley valve and confirms that low operative mortality and excellent clinical improvement can result from the use of small Ionescu-Shiley valves in elderly patients despite moderate postoperative transvalvular gradients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Choudhary, A. Mathur, P. Venugopal, B. Airan, R. Sharma, A. Bhan, A. Saxena, A. Sampath Kumar, S. K. Choudhary, A. Mathur, et al. Prosthesis Size in Aortic Valve Replacement: Surgeon-Related Variable Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2000; 8(4): 333 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Aydogan, H. Akay, G. Orhan, U. Filizcan, N. Kaynarca, O. Yucel, Y. Comertoglu, S. Aykut-Aka, and E. E Eren Early and Midterm Results of Aortic Annular Enlargement Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1999; 7(3): 182 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Vijayanagar, G. Chan, R. Musunuru, N. Sastry, I. Siegman, N. Rattehalli, and M. Cortelli Aortic Valve Replacement Without Annular Enlargement in Patients with Small Aortic Roots Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1998; 6(4): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-F. Obadia, Y. A. Martelloni, O. H. Bastien, G. M. Durand de Gevigney, and J.-F. Chassignolle Long-Term Follow-up of Small (Size 20 and 21) Medtronic-Hall Aortic Valve Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1997; 64(2): 421 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, H. L. Gately, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1995; 59(5): 1056 - 1062. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Bojar, H. Rastegar, D. D. Payne, C. A. Mack, and S. L. Schwartz Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1993; 56(5): 1141 - 1147. [Abstract] [PDF]