HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vesely, I. Articles by Boughner, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vesely, I. Articles by Boughner, D.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 99, 119-123, Copyright © 1990 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Mechanical testing of cryopreserved aortic allografts. Comparison with xenografts and fresh tissue

I Vesely, L Gonzalez-Lavin, D Graf and D Boughner
John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

Reports indicate that cryopreserved aortic valve allografts have a better long-term survivability than other bioprostheses, such as the porcine xenograft. Unlike xenografts, allograft valves do not require treatment with glutaraldehyde and may therefore retain much of their original mechanical function. The effects of cryopreservation on the mechanical integrity of collagen fibers and mucopolysaccharides, however, are still largely unknown. We therefore compared the mechanical behavior of cryopreserved allograft leaflet material to that of fresh tissue and xenografts by measuring their bending stiffness (nine strips of tissue) and their uniaxial tensile stress/strain and stress/relaxation behavior (six strips of each tissue type). The bending tests showed no significant difference between the pliability of cryopreserved allografts and fresh pig aortic valve tissue, but the xenograft material was significantly stiffer than both (p less than 0.001). The mean circumferential tensile elastic moduli of the allografts, fresh tissue, and xenografts at a stress of 300 kPa were 9.1 +/- 5.4 MPa, 13.0 +/- 1.7 MPa, and 12.5 +/- 3.0 MPa, respectively, and were not significantly different from each other. We also found that the transition from a low to a high modulus on the stress/strain curves, a measure of extensibility, occurs at 23%, 22%, and 12% strain for the three materials. There was no significant difference between the allograft and the fresh tissues, but the xenograft material was less extensible than the other two (p less than 0.001). The xenograft tissue also had significantly lower rates of stress relaxation than the other two materials (p less than 0.005). Thus no detectable differences were found between the mechanical behavior of the cryopreserved allograft aortic leaflets and fresh tissue, whereas the xenograft material was less extensible and less capable of relaxing than both the allograft and fresh tissue. The ability of allografts valves to respond to tensile and flexural stresses in a manner similar to that of the natural aortic valve may therefore contribute to their good in vivo survivability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Raisky, W. B. Ali, F. Bajolle, D. Marini, O. Metton, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and P. R. Vouhe Common arterial trunk repair: with conduit or without? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 675 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fukui, S. Suehiro, T. Shibata, K. Hattori, H. Hirai, and T. Aoyama Aortic root replacement with Freestyle stentless valve for complex aortic root infection J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2003; 125(1): 200 - 203. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.H.D. Danton, D.J. Barron, O. Stumper, J.G. Wright, J. De Giovannni, E.D. Silove, and W.J. Brawn Repair of truncus arteriosus: a considered approach to right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 20(1): 95 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Niwaya, C. J. Knott-Craig, K. Santangelo, M. M. Lane, K. Chandrasekaran, and R. C. Elkins Advantage of autograft and homograft valve replacement for complex aortic valve endocarditis Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1603 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Maselli, R. Pizio, L. P. Bruno, I. Di Bella, and C. De Gasperis Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 67(4): 966 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Niwaya, C. J. Knott-Craig, M. M. Lane, K. Chandrasekaren, E. D. Overholt, and R. C. Elkins CRYOPRESERVED HOMOGRAFT VALVES IN THE PULMONARY POSITION: RISK ANALYSIS FOR INTERMEDIATE-TERM FAILURE J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1999; 117(1): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Doty, J. D. Salazar, J. R. Liddicoat, J. H. Flores, and D. B. Doty Aortic Valve Replacement With Cryopreserved Aortic Allograft: Ten-Year Experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1998; 115(2): 371 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]