|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 99, 639-644, Copyright © 1990 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
M Ben Farhat, H Boussadia, I Gandjbakhch, H Mzali, A Chouaieb, M Ayari and K Ben Salah
Controversy persists regarding whether the efficacy of closed instrumental
mitral commissurotomy compares well enough with that of open commissurotomy
to warrant its continued use. The purpose of this study was to compare the
results of operation as determined by catheterization studies in 63
patients with pure, severe, and noncalcified mitral stenosis. The patients
were randomly assigned to one of two groups: thirty-two patients were
operated on by the closed technique (group I) and 31 by the open technique
(group II). All patients underwent left-sided and right-sided
catheterization before and 4 months after operation. Preoperatively the two
groups were statistically similar with regard to major clinical data and
hemodynamic findings. There were no deaths at operation or systemic
embolism in the two groups. The prevalence of surgically induced mitral
regurgitation was similar in the two groups (12.4% versus 12.9%). Pulmonary
arterial pressure and arteriolar and total pulmonary vascular resistance
decreased significantly in the two groups. Pulmonary capillary wedge
pressure decreased from 23.3 +/- 8.5 to 15.8 +/- 7 mm Hg in group I (p less
than 0.001) and from 23.7 +/- 6 to 14 +/- 5.8 mm Hg in group II (p less
than 0.001). Cardiac index increased from 2.86 +/- 0.84 to 3.14 +/- 0.78
L/min/m2 in group I, but this increase did not reach statistical
significance. In group II cardiac index increased from 2.89 +/- 0.6 to 3.6
+/- 0.6 L/min/m2 (p less than 0.005). The mean and end-diastolic
transmitral pressure gradients decreased significantly in the two groups,
but the decrease was statistically greater in the open mitral
commissurotomy group (p less than 0.001). Mitral valve area increased from
0.82 +/- 0.18 to 1.4 +/- 0.40 cm2 in group I (p less than 0.01) and from
0.84 +/- 0.15 to 2.14 +/- 0.53 cm2 in group II (p less than 0.001). The
mean increase in mitral valve area was 0.61 cm2 in group I and 1.34 cm2 in
group II (p less than 0.001). At exercise, in patients with resting
pulmonary capillary wedge pressures of 18 mm Hg or less, cardiac index
increased by 36% in group I (23 patients) and 48% in group II (24
patients), because of a smaller mitral valve area in group I (1.61 +/- 0.39
cm2) than in group II (2.45 +/- 0.65 cm2). Thus open commissurotomy
improved hemodynamic values to a greater extent than closed commissurotomy
at both rest and exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
ARTICLES
Closed versus open mitral commissurotomy in pure noncalcific mitral stenosis: hemodynamic studies before and after operation
Department of Medicine, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Tunisia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Choudhary, J. Dhareshwar, A. Govil, B. Airan, and A. S. Kumar Open mitral commissurotomy in the current era: indications, technique, and results Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 41 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Zeymer and K.-L. Neuhaus Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty--the first line treatment for mitral stenosis and restenosis Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2000; 21(20): 1643 - 1644. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Detter, T. Fischlein, C. Feldmeier, G. Nollert, H. Reichenspurner, and B. Reichart Mitral commissurotomy, a technique outdated? long-term follow-up over a period of 35 years Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1999; 68(6): 2112 - 2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Akinci, M. Degertekin, M. Guler, B. Daglar, N. Bozbuga, T. Berki, and C. Yakut Less invasive approaches for closed mitral commissurotomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 14(3): 274 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cotrufo, A. Renzulli, G. Ismeno, A. Caruso, C. Mauro, P. Caso, L. De Simone, and R. Violini Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy versus open mitral commissurotomy: a comparative study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 15(5): 646 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Farhat, M. Ayari, F. Maatouk, F. Betbout, H. Gamra, M. Jarrar, M. Tiss, S. Hammami, R. Thaalbi, and F. Addad Percutaneous Balloon Versus Surgical Closed and Open Mitral Commissurotomy : Seven-Year Follow-up Results of a Randomized Trial Circulation, January 27, 1998; 97(3): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Suri, R. Pathania, N. K. Jha, H. Singh, R. S. Dhaliwal, S. S. Rana, S. K. Thingnam, V. Sarwal, and J. S. Gujral CLOSED MITRAL VALVOTOMY FOR MITRAL RESTENOSIS: EXPERIENCE IN 113 CONSECUTIVE CASES J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1996; 112(3): 727 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. David Update on Mitral Valve Repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1995; 59(5): 1257 - 1258. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Carabello and F. A. Crawford Therapy for Mitral Stenosis Comes Full Circle N. Engl. J. Med., October 13, 1994; 331(15): 1014 - 1015. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |