JTCS Concomitant Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix of Key References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Adam E. Saltman
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saltman, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saltman, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:311-313
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Editorial

New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation: A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma

Adam E. Saltman, MD, PhDa,*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Physiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Mass, USA

Received for publication March 26, 2003; revisions received April 8, 2003; accepted for publication April 24, 2003.

* Address for reprints: Adam E. Saltman, MD, PhD, Division of CT Surgery, 55 Lake Avenue North, S3-747, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
adam.saltman@umassmed.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


An appendix of 24 key references is available online.

 

Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains the most common and vexing problem confronting cardiac surgeons. It afflicts as many as 40% of patients undergoing coronary and valve surgery and has been refractory to many attempted methods of prevention, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic. In this issue of the Journal, Melo and colleagues1 have described a simple, quick, and effective adjunct procedure applied at the time of the operation that appears to halve the incidence of PAF.

Although these authors have elegantly described a method that resulted in a 58% reduction in the incidence of PAF, what is most interesting is that neither this study nor any of those that have preceded it over the last 40 years has demonstrated a prophylaxis that completely prevents PAF. Why is this? Most likely it is our poor understanding of the mechanism underlying PAF: we simply do not know what causes this phenomenon and therefore have been unable to make meaningful and effective progress against it.

A review of electrophysiologic basics should prove helpful. Atrial fibrillation is a reentrant arrhythmia. For any reentrant arrhythmia to occur, 2 conditions must exist: there must be an initiating event that sets up the reentrant circuit, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.