|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:925-926
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communication |
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
b Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Presented at the American Transplant Congress, Seattle, Wash, May 22, 2005.
Received for publication May 13, 2005; accepted for publication August 17, 2005. * Address for reprints: Nader Moazami, MD, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queeny TowerSuite 3108, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St Louis, MO 63110. (Email: moazamin@msnotes.wustl.edu).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The initial thoracic organ allocation scheme was 7-tiered, based on that used for renal allocations. The first revision, in 1989, was to a 2-tiered system. Because of its inadequacy in addressing certain patients and potential for abuse, and before widespread use of ventricular assist devices, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in 1999 modified its thoracic organ allocation scheme from a 2-tiered to a 3-tiered system.
1
As contemporary medical and nontransplant surgical therapy for heart failure continues to improve, the benefit of heart transplantation in patients with UNOS status 2 heart disease has come under scrutiny. Recently, UNOS proposed a modification for the heart transplant allocation scheme that increases availability of hearts to patients with status 1A and 1B heart disease (Table 1).
2
This study sought to evaluate the outcome of UNOS status 2 registrants in the era of modern medical management and under the current UNOS scheme for heart transplantation.
|
The study cohort included all patients aged more than 18 years
Related Article
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 131: 775-776.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Mancini and K. Lietz Selection of Cardiac Transplantation Candidates in 2010 Circulation, July 13, 2010; 122(2): 173 - 183. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Lund, J. Matthews, and K. Aaronson Patient selection for left ventricular assist devices Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2010; 12(5): 434 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Komoda, R. Hetzer, and H. B. Lehmkuhl Destiny of candidates for heart transplantation in the Eurotransplant heart allocation system Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2008; 34(2): 301 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lietz and L. W. Miller Improved Survival of Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure Listed for Heart Transplantation: Analysis of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/U.S. United Network of Organ Sharing Data, 1990 to 2005 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 25, 2007; 50(13): 1282 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Smedira Allocating hearts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2006; 131(4): 775 - 776. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |