JTCS St. Jude Medical
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert M. Sade
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sade, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sade, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrow Professional affairs
Right arrowRelated Articles

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:245-246
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Statistics for the Rest of Us

Reports of clinical trials: Ethical aspects

Robert M. Sade, MD *

Department of Surgery and the Institute of Human Values in Health Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Received for publication October 25, 2005; accepted for publication March 3, 2006.

* Address for reprints: Robert M. Sade, MD, Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Surgery, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Suite 409, PO Box 250612, Charleston, SC 29425 (Email: sader@musc.edu).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

GoTiruvoipati and colleagues 1 Go have shown us glaring deficiencies in the reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) literature. The CONSORT statement, a checklist and flowchart used in writing reports of RCTs, is a tool that can be used to improve RCT reports; it is endorsed by most major medical journals but by none of the major cardiothoracic journals. Why is this? One reason might be that RCTs are not as applicable to surgical as to medical disciplines. Indeed, the authors observe that RCTs are only half as prevalent in our journals as they are in general medical journals, and therefore CTS journal editors might be less inclined to pay attention to quality of reporting of low-incidence articles.

RCTs, the gold standard of clinical investigation, are less common in CTS journals than in medical journals for several reasons. Surgical clinical trial protocols that use no-treatment or placebo control groups . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Articles

CONSORT and beyond
Eugene H. Blackstone
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 132: 229-232. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: The way forward
Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian, Gnaneswar Atturu, Giles J. Peek, and Diana Elbourne
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 132: 233-240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomized clinical trials in surgery: Why do we need them?
Charles M. Balch
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 132: 241-242. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomized controlled trials in surgery: Comic opera no more?
Neal F. Kassell and Aaron S. Dumont
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 132: 243-244. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Improving the quality of clinical trials in surgery
Steven Piantadosi
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 132: 247-248. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Believability of clinical trials: A diagnostic testing perspective
Michael S. Lauer
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 132: 249-251. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.