|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:816-817
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Letter to the Editor |
a Institute of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
b Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
c Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va
d Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
e Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, AZ Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
We carefully read the interesting article by Bainbridge and colleagues1
comparing, by means of a meta-analytic approach, the available evidence on off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Six trials involving 989 patients were included. All but 1 trial included only patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending disease. Only 1 trial used paclitaxel or sirolimus-eluting stents. The authors concluded that OPCABG is associated with better short-term and midterm clinical outcomes but also with an increased length of hospital stay.
The authors correctly suggested projecting the results to a population larger than that of the included studies. For example, for every 1000 low-risk patients undergoing OPCABG, there will be approximately 105 fewer patients with recurrent angina, 143 fewer patients with target vessel failure, and 125 fewer patients with major adverse
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |