JTCS St. Jude Medical
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:267-268
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Invited Commentary

Discussion

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dr Thomas A. D'Amico (Durham, NC). I congratulate both authors for this thoughtful study that describes the incidence of nodules that may have been missed at resection for lung cancer, a concept derived from experience with thoracoscopic metastasectomy.

Just as with metastasectomy, it is possible that thoracoscopic exploration for resection of lung cancer will miss nodules, some of which may be malignant. However, in this study, as in others, the majority of missed nodules are benign. Regarding the malignant nodules, the presence has been demonstrated, but the significance, as you said, has not. I and others, I'm sure, are surprised that so many of the nodules missed were 6 mm or larger, including all 3 of the noncarcinoid second primary lesions. One would expect a 64-slice scanner to perform better.

Future studies are required to elucidate the significance of these missed nodules in patients with both benign and secondary pulmonary malignancy. It is possible that sequential thoracoscopic procedures have a better outcome than thoracotomy in some patients, depending on the biology of the tumor.

In light of your study and these comments, I have four questions. What percentage of your patients underwent mediastinoscopy? You found many more patients with N2 disease than with second primary lesions.

Second, why did you not include thoracoscopic exploration as part of your study to determine the true incidence of the missed nodules? Thoracoscopic exploration may have found pleural or other disease that would preclude thoracotomy.

Third, in this study, 14 of 166 patients had missed malignant nodules. Of these 14, 9 of 14, or 5%, were thought to have M1 lesions. Five of those 9 already met criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus only 4 patients, or 2%, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.