HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Cary W. Akins D. Craig Miller Marko I. Turina Nicholas T. Kouchoukos Eugene H. Blackstone Gary L. Grunkemeier Johanna J.M. Takkenberg Tirone E. David Eric G. Butchart David H. Adams David M. Shahian Siegfried Hagl John E. Mayer Bruce W. Lytle Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Akins, C. W. Articles by Lytle, B. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Akins, C. W. Articles by Lytle, B. W. Related Collections Professional affairs

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:732-738
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions

^a The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
^b The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
^c European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Received for publication December 11, 2007; accepted for publication December 11, 2007.

^_* Address for reprints: Cary W. Akins, MD, Cardiac Surgery, Cox 648, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114. (Email: cakins@partners.org).

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

	Introduction

 
Since the initial publication of "Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality After Cardiac Valvular Operations" in 1988,¹ followed by a revised version in 1996,² valvular heart surgery has evolved to include an enhanced understanding of patient- and disease-related factors affecting outcomes, increased numbers of valve repairs, more operations performed for patients with minimal symptoms, new prostheses, novel repair methods, and the emergence of percutaneous interventional (catheter-based) valve repair and replacement. To adapt to this changing environment, the Councils of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery have directed an Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity to review current clinical practice to update and clarify these reporting guidelines. The guidelines are intended to cover treatment of all four cardiac valves in both adult and pediatric patients. Further, these guidelines apply uniformly, irrespective of whether the therapy was carried out as a conventional open operation, as a minimally invasive (video-assisted or robotic) surgical procedure, or with percutaneous interventional catheter techniques.

	Purpose

 
These reporting guidelines are intended to facilitate analysis and reporting of clinical results of various therapeutic approaches to diseased heart valves such that meaningful comparisons can be made and inferences drawn from investigations of medical, surgical, and percutaneous interventional treatment of patients with valvular heart disease.

	Early Mortality

 
Early mortality is to be reported as all-cause mortality at 30, 60, or 90 days and depicted by actuarial estimates (with number remaining at risk and confidence intervals [CIs]) or as simple percentages, regardless of the patient's location, be it home or in a health care facility.

	Definitions of Morbidity

 
Structural Valve Deterioration
Structural valve deterioration includes dysfunction or deterioration involving the operated valve (exclusive of infection or thrombosis), as determined by reoperation, autopsy, or clinical investigation. Clinical investigation should include periodic echocardiographic surveillance. Substantially . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Brown, R. C. Elkins, D. R. Clarke, J. S. Tweddell, C. B. Huddleston, J. R. Doty, J. W. Fehrenbacher, and J. J.M. Takkenberg Performance of the CryoValve SG human decellularized pulmonary valve in 342 patients relative to the conventional CryoValve at a mean follow-up of four years. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2010; 139(2): 339 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. El-Hamamsy, L. Clark, L. M. Stevens, Z. Sarang, G. Melina, J. J.M. Takkenberg, and M. H. Yacoub Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 26, 2010; 55(4): 368 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kulik, R. G. Masters, P. Bedard, P. J. Hendry, B.-K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Postoperative lipid-lowering therapy and bioprosthesis structural valve deterioration: justification for a randomised trial? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 37(1): 139 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. van Gameren, N. Piazza, A. J J C Bogers, J. J M Takkenberg, and A P. Kappetein How to assess risks of valve surgery: quality, implementation and future of risk models Heart, December 1, 2009; 95(23): 1958 - 1963. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Stassano, L. Di Tommaso, M. Monaco, F. Iorio, P. Pepino, N. Spampinato, and C. Vosa Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 10, 2009; 54(20): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. E. Jamieson, R. Koerfer, C. A. Yankah, A. Zittermann, R. I. Hayden, H. Ling, R. Hetzer, and W. B. Dolman Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis -- clinical performance Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 36(5): 818 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. I. Charitos, T. Hanke, U. Stierle, D. R. Robinson, A. J.J.C. Bogers, W. Hemmer, M. Bechtel, M. Misfeld, A. Gorski, J. O. Boehm, et al. Autograft Reinforcement to Preserve Autograft Function After the Ross Procedure: A Report From the German-Dutch Ross Registry Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11_suppl_1): S146 - S154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Seeburger, M. A. Borger, N. Doll, T. Walther, J. Passage, V. Falk, and F. W. Mohr Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 36(3): 532 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Price, H. Lapierre, L. Ressler, B.-K. Lam, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Prosthesis-patient mismatch is less frequent and more clinically indolent in patients operated for aortic insufficiency J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 639 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Himbert, F. Descoutures, N. Al-Attar, B. Iung, G. Ducrocq, D. Detaint, E. Brochet, D. Messika-Zeitoun, F. Francis, H. Ibrahim, et al. Results of transfemoral or transapical aortic valve implantation following a uniform assessment in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 303 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Turina, H. Shennib, J. Dunning, D. Cheng, J. Martin, C. Muneretto, S. Schueler, L. von Segesser, P. T. Sergeant, and on behalf of the ad hoc EACTS/ESCVS committee EACTS/ESCVS best practice guidelines for reporting treatment results in the thoracic aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 927 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Yao, L. Han, Z.-y. Xu, L.-j. Zou, S.-d. Huang, Z.-n. Wang, F.-l. Lu, and Y.-l. Yao Surgical treatment of multivalvular endocarditis: Twenty-one-year single center experience. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2009; 137(6): 1475 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Rahimtoola The Year in Valvular Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2009; 53(20): 1894 - 1908. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Massoudy, M. Thielmann, N. Lehmann, A. Marr, G. Kleikamp, A. Maleszka, A. Zittermann, R. Korfer, M. Radu, A. Krian, et al. Impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery: A multicenter analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 840 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Seeburger, M. A. Borger, V. Falk, J. Passage, T. Walther, N. Doll, and F. W. Mohr Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after previous sternotomy: experience in 181 patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 87(3): 709 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hanke, E. I. Charitos, U. Stierle, D. Robinson, A. Gorski, H.-H. Sievers, and M. Misfeld Factors associated with the development of aortic valve regurgitation over time after two different techniques of valve-sparing aortic root surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 314 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Vahanian, B. Iung, L. Pierard, R. Dion, and J. Pepper CHAPTER 21 Valvular Heart Disease ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Turina Editorial comment Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 796 - 797. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M.A. Klieverik, A. J.J.C. Bogers, and J. J.M. Takkenberg Is the Ross procedure really a Trojan horse: reply Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2008; 29(17): 2181 - 2182. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Piazza, P. de Jaegere, C. Schultz, A. E. Becker, P. W. Serruys, and R. H. Anderson Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve Circ Cardiovasc Interv, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 74 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]