|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:1255-1256
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Letter to the Editor |
Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology, Inserm 644, Hopital Charles Nicolle, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
We read with interest the comments of Zegdi and colleagues1
on our article entitled "Surgical aortic valve replacement after percutaneous aortic valve implantation: what have we learned?"2
The authors raised several important questions about transcatheter heart valve (THV) size selection according to the aortic annular diameter and the issue of oversizing. In the case reported a 23-mm balloon expandable Cribier–Edwards THV had been selected for an aortic annulus measured to 20 mm by using echocardiographic analysis (2 mm of oversizing), which was in agreement with the Edwards company's recommendations. After THV implantation, it clearly appeared that the THV size was too small, explaining the subsequent severe paravalvular leak leading to surgical valve replacement.
Retrospectively,
Related Article
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009 138: 260.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |