|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:891-893
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Editorials |
From Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik fur Thorax-, Herz- und Gefasschirur, Hannover, Germany.
Received for publication April 4, 2002. Accepted for publication July 18, 2002. Address for reprints: Axel Haverich, MD, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik fur Thorax-, Herz- und Gefasschirur, Hannover D-30623, Germany (E-mail: haverich@thg.mh-hannover.de).
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Introduction |
|---|
| |||||||||||
During the first months of my training, you taught me the differences between acute versus chronic and type A versus type B aortic dissections. You always preferred the Stanford classification system for two reasons: (1) its indicative value for the type of surgical approach; (2) its inherent prognostic information. Our policy then and for the next 20 years was the one exercised by most surgical groups, including Stanford: medical treatment for uncomplicated acute type B dissections and surgery for all type A
Related Article
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002 124: 896-910.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-Y. Yu, Y.-S. Chen, S.-C. Huang, S.-S. Wang, and F.-Y. Lin Late outcome of patients with aortic dissection: study of a national database Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 683 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |